You said I'm a "fake Libertarian" because I don't waver in my position. Your "logic" is uncertainty = authenticity and that someone who knows what they believe in can't be a "real" Libertarian.If debating ones own ideology is some kind of measure of intelligence, and i just posted 2 small examples of me debating my own ideologies, what does that say? I know you are not a retard but apparently you are unable to use your own arguments of why you are a "libertarian" to me moving between big L and little l.
Do you feel "forced" when you buy a new gun now? Because we already register new firearms sold. If the answer is "no", which it must be given you don't even seem to be aware it happened, then how is reporting the transfer of a gun you no longer "need" imposing on your right to own a gun or any measurable increase in the use "force"?You want to use FORCE against the population to have them register their guns purchases,
I'm not sure how I'm supposed to respond to your hypothetical situations I never proposed.ammo purchases and i will assume, even their gun training classes or shooting range visits or their results from said visit to make sure they are competent.
I'm not going to argue the hypothetical with you. This kind of stupid strategy of being against something because of imagined consequences serves no purpose but to demonstrate your failure to argue against the original point.Why do i say that? Because that is the next step. After that, the govt can begin to tax gun owners and use FORCE against them to purchase Jewish owned insurance against their guns.
I believe in personal liberty. I also believe "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one".I have been reading your posts for a long time dude. You appear to like the social freedoms afforded by libertarians but clam up when it comes to economic and personal freedoms of protection.
So your fear of government tracking gun owners seems a bit silly when the biggest lobbying organization already knows better than the government who and where the gun owners are.
All around the world, registration has led to confiscation: Australia, Canada, Bermuda, Cuba, Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Ireland. The list goes on.
The pattern is the same no matter which country or what era. The excuses vary, but always include “keeping civil order” or “preventing crime.” Whenever the creation of a national, computerized database of gun owners is proposed, the advocates pushing it insist that people have nothing to fear because politicians will not abuse the enormous power inherent in such a database. Then, history proves, shortly after records of law-abiding gun owners are compiled, gun bans are put in place and firearms are confiscated.
I believe in personal liberty. I also believe "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one".
Are you calling the armies in the Middle East "modern military"? Or is this about those brown people with guns you're afraid of?