So if two people are having a competely trivial argument over the phone or in the same room for hours on end, they're also running in the special olympics, right?Gringo said:It isn't the idea that the arguments are like the special olympics. It's the fact that you're arguing over something (usually) so trivial and going on and on about it for pages. New lows are hit constantly in such threads.
piotrr said:So if two people are having a competely trivial argument over the phone or in the same room for hours on end, they're also running in the special olympics, right?
So it's more like
"Arguing a trivial subject for several typed pages is like running in the Special Olympics...
You are retarded no matter what happens."
And, if I may ask, what were you just doing again?
I said "if". "So if", even. "So if two". Oh, it's right up there. ^^Gringo said:I think you need to re-evaluate the types of arguments people have face to face (or even over the phone) versus the types of arguments people have on TW.
you owned this threadpiotrr said:I'm a star all over again!