Quote:
Originally Posted by Groove
i personally didn't read the entire ruling so i may be wrong but they don't appear to be saying google is a monopoly - they said they abused their market dominance
not really the same thing
reporters seem to be adding the 'monopoly' part, maybe as an oversimplification or to make people angry or whatever other motivation they may have
|
i honestly don't even know if i agree with the ruling or the lawsuit
i am just pointing out that the ruling has already been made by some
is written in stone in Europe and by EU
Why was Microsoft subject to antitrust charges in 1998?
same went for Microsoft with their browser, internet explorer, when there were viable alternatives to that to ......
i mean i know a case can be made that there are about as many independent ISP providers in the USA than there are search engines that in no way use, are optimized by, or reference GOOGLE search indexing (i mean ffs look at our own search on this site)
in fact i would argue there are far more ISP providers than search engines who completely fit that criteria (considering their market share)..........soooooooo ooo
what all this crying about? How we have so many google apologists while they cry about comcast and charter baffles me right now
that is all i do know.......and it is funny to watch
haven't been this amused since people started sucking off jobs to get back at bill gates