i don't consider it an infringement on religious freedom
the same way i don't consider taxpayer-funded government services running on the sabbath an infringement on religious freedoms of hassidic jews
i consider it an essential service funded by the taxpayers that religious nuts will have to deal with
if it was essential to put religious symbols on ambulances and fire trucks in order for them to run, then by all means go ahead and infringe on my rights
they should also round up all the gays, mexicans, and athiests into concentration camps where they can make their own choice whether to accept re-education or if not, they can be exterminated.
they should also round up all the gays, mexicans, and athiests into concentration camps where they can make their own choice whether to accept re-education or if not, they can be exterminated.
Sounds like you've thought this through a time or two.
I'm going to start a new musical style featuring heavy distortion, relentless tempo and screamed lyrics debating the concept of government-subsidized medical insurance providers.
In a world where everyone has healthcare i would say **** no, especially when most abortions are the result of people being to stupid take precautions.
In a world where everyone has healthcare i would say **** no, especially when most abortions are the result of people being to stupid take precautions.
With the exception of **** of course.
then people are going to use coat hangers and then go to the hospital when the bleeding doesnt stop....for free.
Do you seriously ****ing think that any agency is PRO-abortion?
Edit: FNGR. I may end up moving to the Austin area. (near Round Rock). Are dumb rednecks like you everywhere or just in the boonies? I'm hoping that near cities and in nice suburbs alcoholic fundamentalist idiots like you don't exist.
Would you consider government-funded abortion as an infringement upon religious freedom--being that you are taxing pro-lifers in order to pay for killing the unborn.
Recently, a U.S. Congressman was chastised for his contradictory stances in regards to practicing Catholocism and yet supporting pro-abortion legislation.
So if you are going to get pissed about the government merely allowing for religious-based symbols to be placed on government property then how do you justify forcing a person who doesn't believe in elective abortion to have to pay for it?
I'm almost certain that you'll do your best to dodge the hypocrisy bullet.
I'm pro-death and am opposed to the idea of being taxed to pay for life, especially new babies.