no, that's the problem with the democratic party and the clintons. there's plenty of progressives who know exactly why the clinton lost. and some of them didn't vote for clinton because they just plain didn't like her.
the democrats and the clinton apologists are going to try to make this about race and gender and how third party candidates like jill stein siphoned away votes that should have been hillary's. it's going to be the whole gore-nader thing from 2000 all over again.
trump won michigan by about 12,000 votes. jill stein got 50,000 votes.
trump won wisconsin by about 30,000 votes. jill stein got about 30,000 votes.
trump won pennsylvania by about 60,000 votes. jill stein got about 50,000 votes and gary johnson got about 150,000 votes.
if everyone who voted for jill stein or gary johnson in florida voted for hillary she would have won the state.
hillary lost because no one likes her. she lost because she, and her supporters, were in this bubble of "it's my turn" and "who else you going to vote for?" and "trump is a scary person of course you'll run to me for protection!" the fact that no one likes her and the democrats ran her anyway did her in.
dems probably would have won with either biden or sanders.
the "progressives" out there in portland and everywhere else should be protesting the democratic party and demanding that *everyone* who had a position of power for this election step down and never participate in party politics ever again. this election should have been a cakewalk for the dems but somehow they ****ed it up.