Harvey Weinstein - Another pervert Jew outed

I agree that most black women are very straight-forward when they want you. But, I have always appreciated that.
 
black chicks can be aggressive or very standoffish just like any girl who is or isnt into u. u probly just pull more black chicks for whatever reason...perhaps location
 
Yeah I don't think this is an argument you want to take up SamUwell nobody should be hiding a camera in a Kleenex box to spy on company/employees using their restrooms in their house. I think that's an invasion of privacy
 
Last edited:
SeVeReD said:
Yeah I don't think this is an argument you want to take up SamUwell nobody should be hiding a camera in a Kleenex box to spy on company/employees using their restrooms in their house. I think that's an invasion of privacy
Click to expand...
Don't think for one second i am defending the dude that did this because i am not. The fucking guy should have removed them prior to this guest coming into his home.

I just cannot believe that the State can now determine where i can and cannot have a camera in the house that i am leasing from them and buying from the banks. Want to talk about an abuse of power? Since when and where does the Federal, State or Local government have the right to dictate what rooms in my home i can have a recording device in my own home? Is there some super secret list that the government has where they have decided that we cannot do certain things in certain rooms?

How long until they decide that we cannot have cameras in our bedrooms? Where does it end?
 
I agree. It's really weird and downright creepy thing to do, but if it's his home, his property, the government can just fuck off, thanks.

The only time I break from this hardline libertarian stuff though is if kids are involved. If the nanny was under 18 and this happened, it would not really upset me. But since she's 18 the government can fuck off.
 
She's an employee using the restroom in the workplace. It's not apples to apples with traditional employment/workplaces (or maybe there is a contract involved - who knows) but it's fucking bizarre and apparently enough people agree that it's an unwarranted invasion of (reasonably expected) privacy.
 
Reggs said:
The only time I break from this hardline libertarian stuff though is if kids are involved. If the nanny was under 18 and this happened, it would not really upset me. But since she's 18 the government can fuck off.
Click to expand...
I noticed that too.

Why did the media use teen when she is an adult woman? The headline reads like it was a young teenager. And, what if she was? What if this kid had sex in his room and his camera caught it? Would he charged with child pornography?

This is a big overreach of power for the government.
Bodom said:
She's an employee using the restroom in the workplace. It's not apples to apples with traditional employment/workplaces (or maybe there is a contract involved - who knows) but it's fucking bizarre and apparently enough people agree that it's an unwarranted invasion of (reasonably expected) privacy.
Click to expand...
Yeah... because this adult female was hired and worked out of his home, Im curious if his residency must be treated as a place of business and during times where someone is employed, he loses his personal rights to his property?
 
samUwell said:
Good news everyone!

If you want to abuse an elderly or a child, make sure you do it in the bathroom because apparently, you are not allowed to have a camera in your very own bathroom in the house you are buying from the banks and leasing from the State.
Click to expand...

Just so I have your context right, you believe you should have the right to have a camera in your bathroom without letting people know it’s there that you invite to use it?

Did I miss your sarcasm somewhere?
 
samUwell said:
I noticed that too.

Why did the media use teen when she is an adult woman? The headline reads like it was a young teenager. And, what if she was? What if this kid had sex in his room and his camera caught it? Would he charged with child pornography?
Click to expand...
thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, seventeen, eighteen, nineteen. notice a pattern?

This is a big overreach of power for the government.
Yeah... because this adult female was hired and worked out of his home, Im curious if his residency must be treated as a place of business and during times where someone is employed, he loses his personal rights to his property?
Click to expand...
It looks like if you think your personal rights extend to videotaping people changing/pooping while they use your personal/work restroom and without their knowledge or consent...you would be correct.
 
I think you people are hung up on the wrong thing. So the media may have sensationalized the headline, whatever. The disturbing thing here is we have TDubbers here that think they should constitutionally be able to hide cameras on their personal property filming people in bathrooms unaware.

Rights end when they infringe upon the rights of others. Invading someone’s privacy is infringement of their rights.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top