Massive muli-quote inc...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al'Muktar
you do also realise that while the IRA wrote the book on urban terrorism, the british army wrote the book on counter-terrorism, right?
|
Urban warfare, not terrorism.
Quote:
there's a reason why the british army is still considered the best trained and most elite army in the ****ing world
|
When British threaten and kill people in other countries, it's urban warfare and they're specialists! When people defend their countries from the British, they're urban terrorists.
No bias here gents!
Quote:
and yes, the IRA were ****ing terrorists
more pro than the taliban.
|
That's funny you should idiotically compare them to the Taliban. They were "freedom fighters" not too long ago.
---
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wowbagger
Ironically, complaining about the racial makeup of a video like this a cornerstone of political correctness. Some people just take things in the opposite direction.
|
Reality is factual. Political correctness is not.
For example, if a TV show like "Cops" shows 60-70% white people breaking the law on the show, even though in reality it's 60-70% black people, and the only reason they don't show that real percentage is to be politically correct, then it's not a representation of reality. Therefore one is justified in calling out its bull****. And it's NOT political correctness. You're a ****ing retard.
---
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al'Muktar
but dont realise that the reason there is PC is because people are ****ing retarded
|
You don't realize how true that statement is.
---
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wowbagger
What I mean is, a cornerstone of political correctness is complaining that media doesn't show the "right" balance of races, whatever you consider that to be. It's more common for people to make the complaint, "these shows don't offer any role models for such-and-such a minority", or, "movie-writers consider white and male the 'default' so you see a disproportionate amount of them as the protagonists." But you're doing the same kind of complaining when you say, "this video doesn't show a (what I consider to be) realistic portrayal in that there's too many/not enough of ______ race."
And to be frank, the first two complaints at least have some kind of noble goal in mind, even if you don't agree with their methods. Complaining that a terrorist warning video doesn't have enough Arabs... what is that even trying to accomplish?
|
"What you consider to be realistic." That's the libtard equivalent of religious person's views.
There is no "consider to be realistic." There's realistic and then there's politically correct.
---
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vanster
Validuz is right about the colloquial definition of terrorism evolving to encompass any law-breaking. I don't think most people would be able to define terrorism, only give examples of it.
|
No, no, no, Van. Clearly anyone against your country is a terrorist nation/organization. And anything you do is "specialist elite activity that the world looks up to." Terrorism exists, it's just never on MY side obviously!
---
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grief
According to Validuz, having a beard means you aren't white.
His mother was white, btw. Father was African. But he looks pretty ****ing white to me.
Also, he was British. Just more evidence that the UK is a harbor for terrorists.
|
Well I guess they should take away the title of first black President from Obama then. He had a white mother. He's clearly white!
---
Quote:
Originally Posted by Data
I'm actually rather impressed.
With how incredibly stupid Validouche is. That's a whole lot of retard densely packed into 1 person.
|
Another quality rebuttal by libtard Data. The guy with ****** anime chicks in his sig is slamming me. Oh God, how will I ever recover?!
---
Quote:
Originally Posted by coombz
facts = not really something you can have a debate about
|
Exactly. That's why they're not terrorists.
---
Quote:
Originally Posted by james
Actually, note taking at sensitive locations, especially if the person is loitering (i.e. sitting at a subway station taking notes even after multiple trains pass), is a key indicator of pre-attack surveillance.
|
If you're dumb enough to have to be told that, you're too ****ing stupid to figure it out even if someone was doing something suspicious. All this crap does is fear-monger and cause even more erroneous reports/sightings to be filed.
---
Quote:
Originally Posted by [MD5]Hash
Be afraid, be very afraid.
Did I miss anything?
|
Nope, that's pretty much the gist of it.