VeteranXX
|
it matters to me we need content the twitter files part 35 doesn't even rate a bump anymore
|
|
|
VeteranXV Contributor
|
okay, groomer. get a life, now.
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by samUwell
Not very many blacks in that picture. Seeing as how diversity is a strength - in tearing a nation to pieces - if I were Putler, I'd be shipping Africans over there left and right and wait it out.
|
getting a nig elected into a city like baltimore is probably cheaper than just dropping a nuke on it... and somehow makes u look like a good guy
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
i too hav a long range rocket
|
|
|
|
reee why u give aid 2 ukraine when reparations haven't been paid yet?!?!?
#walkawayrofl
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
we've never waged a proxy war against russia
we're all learning here
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veniggs
we've never waged a proxy war against russia out in the open
we're all learning here
|
Fixt
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
we gotta keep the tanks running for the steamroll severed
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
oh wait... we forgot something
tanks need jet cover
Thank god we're ramping up F-16 production
How did they know we were going to need it?
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
I thought the idea of sending f16's over to ukraine was cancelled.
**** ukraine.
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
Anyone know how long it will take for us to build 31 Abrama tanks with 1970s technology to send to the Ukraine?
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
They are not building new Abrams....
They, in all likelihood, will take Abrams in reserve and refurbish them, probably from inventories already in Europe, ie: Poland. Then buy shiny new "M1A3" Abrams for the US inventory to replace what they gave away.
And the Abrams they send, won't be the fully modernized, advanced variants used by the US Military. They'll be down-rated export variants stripped of any high tech sensitive technologies they don't want falling into the hands of potential enemies... like Russia. So no top of the line protection packages, optics or fire control systems.
The same goes for the Leopard II's or the Challengers. The Germans are not going to risk giving Russia an opportunity to examine and reverse engineer military secrets.
Russia is also threatening NATO about sending ammunition using the depleted uranium projectiles, stating they'll consider it use of nuke "dirty bombs" against Russia... so the Ukrainians might not even get the good ammunition to use in these tanks.
|
|
Last edited by Hellsfury; 02-03-2023 at 17:44..
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
I thought we left a bunch of **** in Afghanistan that can now be reversed engineered by any takers (china russia..)
are you saying we left dated stuff or that we stripped them?
'cause I never heard that
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
The world arms up. What stocks do we buy?
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akela
The world arms up. What stocks do we buy?
|
polymer. wood is just too finicky
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeVeReD
I thought we left a bunch of **** in Afghanistan that can now be reversed engineered by any takers (china russia..)
are you saying we left dated stuff or that we stripped them?
'cause I never heard that
|
i think we built / abandoned about a dozen gas stations, millions of dollars in HVAC equipment, toxic burn pits, hundreds of hummers, dozens of helicopters, etc. built a bunch of roads that lead to nowhere.
i talked to a vet, he drove a truck. he said he often would drive around without any payloads. He said he had to shoot a kid one time.
TBCH it seems like it was all worth it.
Quote:
WASHINGTON ***8212; U.S. taxpayers footed the bill for a $43 million natural-gas filling station in Afghanistan, a boondoggle that should have cost $500,000 and has virtually no value to average Afghans, the government watchdog for reconstruction in Afghanistan announced Monday.
A Pentagon task force awarded a $3 million contract to build the station in Sheberghan, Afghanistan, but ended up spending $12 million in construction costs and $30 million in "overhead" between 2011 and 2014, the Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction (SIGAR) found. Meanwhile, a similar gas station built in neighboring Pakistan cost $500,000.
"It's hard to imagine a more outrageous waste of money than building an alternative fuel station in a war-torn country that costs 8,000% more than it should, and is too dangerous for a watchdog to verify whether it is even operational," Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said in a statement. "Perhaps equally outrageous however, is that the Pentagon has apparently shirked its responsibility to fully account for the taxpayer money that's been wasted ***8212; an unacceptable lack of transparency that I'll be thoroughly investigating."
|
Pentagon blows $43 million on useless Afghan gas station, IG says
avg afghan income is $650/yr.
the cost to convert a car to natural gas because green energy is $700
you too can convert your 30 year old Soviet POS rust bucket to green energy for only the cost of your annual income.
lol
|
|
Last edited by KingSobieski; 02-05-2023 at 10:26..
|
VeteranXX
|
the pentagon should have blown $43 million on making me rich
|
|
|
Tags
|
back to endless wars
,
brain rot gypsy
,
filthy gypsy love putin
,
fucking kikes
,
general validuz
,
how does putin’s dick taste?
,
how does zelensky's d taste?
,
jews
,
low iq canadian gypsy
,
no no we need more fodder
,
we need peace
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
AGENT: claudebot / Y
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09.
|