[Mega] MAGA Super Trump Mega Thread v2
- Thread starter StapleMammal1
- Start date
We also now know why Maricopa County officials are so combative and obstinate with complying with the Senate audit...
Someone went into the Election system and modified and/or deleted the election results from the system a day before the Senate Audit begins.
They have video/photograph evidence of these individuals at the keyboards of the election management system on the days and times these files were accessed despite their attempt to obscure their identity by purging the Windows Security logs with a script.
Now we know why they refuse to provide the networking hardware and other specifically relevant materials that they still have not provided to the Senate by court order.
Someone went into the Election system and modified and/or deleted the election results from the system a day before the Senate Audit begins.
They have video/photograph evidence of these individuals at the keyboards of the election management system on the days and times these files were accessed despite their attempt to obscure their identity by purging the Windows Security logs with a script.
Now we know why they refuse to provide the networking hardware and other specifically relevant materials that they still have not provided to the Senate by court order.
Last edited:
they complain about Reddit yet ban everyone from the Donald or patriots.win
Typical snowflakes
lmao yeah okay
just take a look at this...
Politics
read all of the thread titles. THAT is the definition of propaganda and echo chamber. it's incredible, actually.
According to a document detailing the pay rates of those involved in the recount, one person who worked for just 12 days on the months-long audit took home over $20,000
Damn this Shiva guy and his team are almost on brad's level of grifting
We got the best grifters bois
pay no attn to these curtains they are getting redecorated p soon
it's around half that much.
wouldn't it be funny if it turned out the "surge in duplicate ballots after Nov 4th" turned out to all be Trump votes.
ie: the trump voters wake up the morning after the election, see that trump is losing and the election is being stolen. So in a fevered rush, tons of them decided to send in their vote again, because they assume it was flipped on them and they need to 'flip it back'.
ie: the trump voters wake up the morning after the election, see that trump is losing and the election is being stolen. So in a fevered rush, tons of them decided to send in their vote again, because they assume it was flipped on them and they need to 'flip it back'.
jfc. all these months of ppl talking about how this audit will prove the fraud because we will finally 'see the signatures'.
The day finally comes, and shiva says "you know what we should do now? we should be given the green light to examine the signatures.
lawd.
The day finally comes, and shiva says "you know what we should do now? we should be given the green light to examine the signatures.
lawd.
It doesn't matter who the extra votes were for IMO. If people lose faith in the system everything falls apart. It should be next to impossible to rig the vote one way or another.
There's honestly no reason why we can't have a Voter ID system connected to a verifiable/auditable database (blockchain even). Make it immutable and prosecute anyone who uses someone else's identity to steal their vote.
There's honestly no reason why we can't have a Voter ID system connected to a verifiable/auditable database (blockchain even). Make it immutable and prosecute anyone who uses someone else's identity to steal their vote.
They didn't do signature verification. They were not allowed too and Dr.Shiva was only tasked with comparing signatures on the Ballot Envelopes. That didn't involve comparing or validating signatures with the Voter Rolls, only checking the presence of signatures on the ballot envelopes, because they represent the sworn affidavit that must accompany a mailed-in ballot.
He took a 40,000ft view of the ballot data he was provided and still found 17,000 anomalies that should require clarification such as the high number of duplicates, the number of blank signature boxes that are stamped approved, why the signature boxes appear to overlap the certification approval stamps, and why the surge in deviations in the days after November 4th that suddenly went from a rate of 5% to 95%.
This was from simply checking if the signature was present and didn't evaluate what constitutes a signature or if that signature legally matches the voter roll records.
So if you found 17,000 anomalies while barely trying, imagine what might turn up with the more stringent "gold standard" of signature verification that supposedly involves even greater scrutiny.
In 2016 Arizona counted 1.2 million ballots and only rejected 1,500 ballots for signature problems... but in 2020, they counted 1.9 million and only rejected 500? The same thing was seen in Georgia, where historically the state rejects a minimum of 1% of mailed-in ballots for signature problems, but in 2020 received 10x the number of ballots by mail and only rejected 900 ballots, well below previous elections and not congruent with statistical predictions. You shouldn't get fewer errors when counting more ballots.
He took a 40,000ft view of the ballot data he was provided and still found 17,000 anomalies that should require clarification such as the high number of duplicates, the number of blank signature boxes that are stamped approved, why the signature boxes appear to overlap the certification approval stamps, and why the surge in deviations in the days after November 4th that suddenly went from a rate of 5% to 95%.
This was from simply checking if the signature was present and didn't evaluate what constitutes a signature or if that signature legally matches the voter roll records.
So if you found 17,000 anomalies while barely trying, imagine what might turn up with the more stringent "gold standard" of signature verification that supposedly involves even greater scrutiny.
In 2016 Arizona counted 1.2 million ballots and only rejected 1,500 ballots for signature problems... but in 2020, they counted 1.9 million and only rejected 500? The same thing was seen in Georgia, where historically the state rejects a minimum of 1% of mailed-in ballots for signature problems, but in 2020 received 10x the number of ballots by mail and only rejected 900 ballots, well below previous elections and not congruent with statistical predictions. You shouldn't get fewer errors when counting more ballots.
