VeteranX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Musashi
Well, you may have a point that the data was VALID but even given that, it was still not relevant.
|
1. you still refuse to admit The Economist is a conservative free-trade commentary mag, dontcha?
2. im glad you admit the data is VALID and point out that the issue is merely what we make of it. You insist it's completely irrelevant. I disagree. I just dont think you can generalize from it too much ( although there's an underlying POINT being made by The Economist in citing this anecdotal data)
3. it's obviously not completely irrelevant... even if limited data, when 71% of the independent economists say obama knows economics better, that he has better policy ideas and would hire better people. RELEVANT to what's going on in the campaign? RELEVANT to what other polls say about Mccain/Obama? RELEVANT to the economic crisis?
To each their own... but at least you guys have progressed beyond calling The Economist a lefty rag... calling all the respondents academic DNC workers... etc.
Maybe... gosh... we'll talk about THE ECONOMY eventually...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COW5JTB5fsI
|
|
Last edited by TseTse; 10-06-2008 at 21:25..
|
VeteranXV
|
Quote:
1. you refuse to admit The Economist is a conservative free-trade commentary mag
|
didn't they endorse obama? how conservative.
|
|
|
VeteranX Contributor
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FngrBANG
BECAUSE POST #420 DESERVES A REPEAT!
Holy sh*t! Is this argument STILL going on!?
I mean, I like how all of the major national news agencies are spouting, "This is the worst economic downturn in OVER EIGHT YEARS!"
Seriously you idiots...who was last in office OVER EIGHT YEARS AGO?
...and who do YOU PERSONALLY BELIEVE is going to win this next election?
F*cking morons.
|
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by triple
didn't they endorse obama? how conservative.
|
|
|
|
SGT Shred++ Contributor
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TseTse
1. you still refuse to admit The Economist is a conservative free-trade commentary mag, dontcha?
2. im glad you admit the data is VALID and point out that the issue is merely what we make of it. You insist it's completely irrelevant. I disagree. I just dont think you can generalize from it too much (although there's an underlying POINT being made by The Economist in citing this anecdotal data)
3. it's obviously not completely irrelevant... even if limited data, when 71% of the independent economists say obama knows economics better, that he has better policy ideas and would hire better people. RELEVANT to what's going on in the campaign? RELEVANT to what other polls say about Mccain/Obama? RELEVANT to the economic crisis?
To each their own... but at least you guys have progressed beyond calling The Economist a lefty rag... calling all the respondents academic DNC workers... etc.
Maybe... gosh... we'll talk about THE ECONOMY eventually...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COW5JTB5fsI
|
1. I don't know the economist, but I know it's written by people, and people have political opinions. This article was very left wing and stinks of partisan hackery.
2. The data is as valid as my hypothetical data on the Steves is. It's still retarded. Btw, where in the first 21 pages of this thread did you use "anecdotal?"
3. Still not relevant. The data proves nothing, ther than they got the responses back that they did. The data may be accurate for the sample they got back and may be valid in the sense that they entered in the opinions into a spreadsheet without ****ing it up, but it has no signifigance at all. To assert otherwise is academic dishonesty (that's something educated people fear, you may learn that if you go for your associates)
Let me add #4. you need to click on Youtube vids to see how long they are and how much time you need to waste on what is probably ****ty propaganda, therefore it is presumptively tl;dr.
|
|
|
VeteranX
|
That's ridiculous - so even if they were previously conservative, if they endorse an atypical candidate, that disqualifies their history?
|
|
|
SGT Shred++ Contributor
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMVDA
That's ridiculous - so even if they were previously conservative, if they endorse an atypical candidate, that disqualifies their history?
|
yes
|
|
|
VeteranX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Musashi
yes
|
Sarcasm, right?
|
|
|
SGT Shred++ Contributor
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMVDA
Sarcasm, right?
|
no.
If I claim to be a vegetarian all my life, then suddenly start eating bacon-wrapped chicken fried steak every meal, am I still a vegetarian?
Or, if I was straight my entire life, then started going to gay bath houses and letting the local bears run a train on my ass, I would be TseTse
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
I dont think I was saying it "disqualifies their history".
Is it somewhat relevant to a story on this specific election? uh, yea
|
|
|
SGT Shred++ Contributor
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by triple
I dont think I was saying it "disqualifies their history".
Is it somewhat relevant to a story on this specific election? uh, yea
|
Well if you want to get serious and academic, sure you could say that, but it's more fun to make your point with bacon wrapped chicken fried steak and TseTse getting gang banged by bears.
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
sounds like a post a former gay pornstar would make.
|
|
|
VeteranX
|
LIST OF IDIOTS THAT THINK THE ECONOMIST IS A LEFTY MAGAZINE:
- triple
- dumpy dip****
- zulu
- musashi
Who am i missing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMVDA
That's ridiculous - so even if they were previously conservative, if they endorse an atypical candidate, that disqualifies their history?
|
You're talking to a bunch of blind partisans who think if you dont 100% tow the party line then you are a flaming liberal partisan on the "other side." That's how these goofs think.
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
Did I say it was a lefty magazine, or did I say they endorsed barack obama? Which they did, of course.
New rule: You can never ***** about straw man arguments again.
I stated a fact, not an opinion.
|
|
|
VeteranX
|
Don't back-pedal, triple... it's not like you.
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
Yes or no, did the economist endorse barack obama?
|
|
|
VeteranX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by triple
Yes or no, did the economist endorse barack obama?
|
In the primary, yes.
I dont remember them endorsing him over Mccain, officially, but they certainly have been increasingly slamming Mccain... like MANY CONSERVATIVES HAVE BEEN. ANd even if they did endorse Obama over Mccain, your point is what? That this makes them "less conservative"?
You're just proving the point...
(hint: the economist is making a POINT when they reported this data saying that economists they are talking to swing obama)
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
You're such a disingenuous piece of ****, tsetse
im glad the rest of the forum hates you now too
Quote:
That this makes them "less conservative"?
|
Yes. Voting for tried and true liberals MAKES YOU LESS CONSERVATIVE. If I suddenly started voting for kennedy and kerry and deval ID BE LESS CONSERVATIVE. On the contrary if the nyt endorsed mccain or bush they'd be less liberal. Shocking!
This is not groundbreaking stuff, here.
|
|
Last edited by triple; 10-06-2008 at 22:04..
|
VeteranX
|
Aww... triple freaks out when he realizes he's making my point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by triple
You're such a disingenuous piece of ****, tsetse
im glad the rest of the forum hates you now too
Yes. Voting for tried and true liberals MAKES YOU LESS CONSERVATIVE.
This is not groundbreaking stuff, here.
|
Oh man, so anybody who isnt for Mccain is a liberal. Classic Triple Logic.
"EVERYBODY HATES YOU!!!"
(funny, i dont actually get nominated for those ban threads you do well in)
The Economist is criticizing Mccain for how he's lying, smearing and putting forth ****ty ideas. His tax plan and economic plans are ****ty. Saying that doesn't make you LIBERAL.... just like criticizing BUSH for being a horrible "conservative" doesnt make somebody LIBERAL either.
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
Quote:
Oh man, so anybody who isnt for Mccain is a liberal.
|
Someone who advocates liberals over a conservatives, but claims to be conservative, is either liberal, or they're voting for the wrong guy.
Why would any bright person vote for the antithesis of their belief system? Explain that.
|
|
|
Tags
|
ignorant liberal
,
kill all liberals
,
more liberal propaganda
,
musashi owns tsetse
,
radon006 loves cock
,
retards making tags
,
triple owns tsetse
,
tsetse is a huge faggot
,
tsetse is a retard magnet
,
tsetse the windbag
,
wall of text
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
AGENT: claudebot / Y
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:57.
|