cell has extreme caps compared to even the shittiest cable plans and there is NO way a cell network could handle saturation by home internet connections. i travel with a cell card, i know how well it works.
absolutely
they stink as much as dsl does in my area tbh
and sadly in many rural areas they don't have anything that is much better than either of these options
assuming they can even get 4g
i am in no way saying it is "your better option" but your other option
and as this holds true they will be forced to improve, expand capacity, as all cell networks have, as these isp's in question become far more greedy cocksuckers (which we can only expect with or without NN)
do you support the government funds that went to BROADBAND providers to provide BROADBAND to additional households, most of which was not used for that purpose?
i absolutely despise all subsidies man
i mentioned on page 1 how much money i feel has been stolen by broadband providers over the years........and how if the government would have just paid for the lines directly we would all be far better off. that way multiple providers could compete over just one line. that this should have been the case for power, phone, internet, you name it already......
that was my proposal #1 to utility decentralization. for them to have better allocated the money they already doled out. at the very least correct this in contractual obligations moving forward.
if fiscal manipulation could force all freeways to 55mph......i can't begin to imagine what they could do to these isp's if they actually tried. tried to do something other than appease lobbyists on behalf of these shitheads......literally throwing our money at them that is unaccounted for to grow these antitrusts