Liberals have to live up each others asses because they can't stand being disagreed with.

literally

Originally Posted by havax

shut up.

we aren't talking about that right now.

keep a lid on it until trump gets into the whitehouse.

thx.

Noted.

So how about them Spurs?

Originally Posted by MadHatSam

I said government needs more cost effective management, but that isn't the same as profit maximization in the private sector.

lol let it go dude, you made an error, it got pointed out, move on. It's 2016.

Originally Posted by StapleMammal1

Noted.

So how about them Spurs?

ur just gonna let it go

i guess pedo enabling must come naturally to you folks

Gay culture revolves around lusting after young durable buttholes.

Originally Posted by Fool

lol let it go dude, you made an error, it got pointed out, move on. It's 2016.

Nah, what else is TW for. Keep misinterpreting my posts though, you do you.

keep your hate speech off this message board

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXpi3F0E5ro

Originally Posted by JudgeU

To all leftist reading this thread,

Wouldn't it be great if the President couldn't effect your life that much? Like if people from Texas and Alabama couldn't tell people in California and New York how to govern themselves? You know, like how the founders of this country WANTED.

Screw you, and your overriding love for a huge ass national government. Get back to local and state having more power and all of a sudden this isn't that big of catastrophe.

To be fair, most Regressives want a single world government and to destroy all national culture, identity, race, religion, etc. I'm sure they'd destroy gender too, if they could (they're sure trying!). Basically they want everyone to be the same: nice compliant little robots toiling and "voting" to the benefit of their corporate and political masters.

Originally Posted by Esteban_Villa

Forgetful of bill winning via a split vote already? He may have won a plurality, but until electoral fusion takes hold nationally (it's not even in the debate) and a 'none of the above' option this literally goes against the original great compromise the country was founded on bridging urban and rural interests

we don't know how the popular vote would have turned out if the electoral college didn't exist. not only is the campaign strategy completely different, there's a lot less reason to be a disenfranchised voter in non-swing states. I think Trump had a good chance of winning a popular vote if that is what mattered.

any urban/rural separation the founding fathers had in mind was entirely due to the fact that rural americans had significantly less exposure to the political climate in the 1700s. that is clearly not the case today, and rural america has the senate to over-represent them already.

it would be less important if the federal government didn't literally have their hands in ****ing everything, and voting repub or democrat will do **** all to change that

Originally Posted by JudgeU

To all leftist reading this thread,

Wouldn't it be great if the President couldn't effect your life that much? Like if people from Texas and Alabama couldn't tell people in California and New York how to govern themselves? You know, like how the founders of this country WANTED.

Screw you, and your overriding love for a huge ass national government. Get back to local and state having more power and all of a sudden this isn't that big of catastrophe.

This was their narrative between 2000 and 2008

when GW BUSH was in office

Then 2008 came



the lost decade as we call it and it took until 2016.....one week ago today for encino man to be defrosted again

now they are all about this after 8 years of Owebama running rouge and shoving his collectivist **** down our throats.

but guess what? It is too late. Too bad you gave your imperial president the keys to far more power.....

Originally Posted by Ixiterra

we don't know how the popular vote would have turned out if the electoral college didn't exist. not only is the campaign strategy completely different, there's a lot less reason to be a disenfranchised voter in non-swing states. I think Trump had a good chance of winning a popular vote if that is what mattered.

any urban/rural separation the founding fathers had in mind was entirely due to the fact that rural americans had significantly less exposure to the political climate in the 1700s. that is clearly not the case today, and rural america has the senate to over-represent them already.

it would be less important if the federal government didn't literally have their hands in ****ing everything, and voting repub or democrat will do **** all to change that

I agree, extrapolating our current results on a different system is incorrect. I'm not sure he would have gained enough to outright win, but it would be a lot closed at a minimum. The same poll analysts who got it wrong now take a different scenario and act as the end all be all arbiter in the 'ah hah, popular vote is what would have made us right'.

The overexposure stems from the ridiculous state lines we have originating from sea to sea grants and a division of North and south territories based on keeping slavery. Here in new York a dozen or so towns wrote a letter to the governor demanding to be allowed to frack or to allow their secession to pennsylvania. What's wrong with a town, county, gravitating towards a state if done by popular referendum? How else are the lines supposed to ever change?

Most of our issues from the middle east to home stem from the arbitrary nature in which we have divideo ourselves. Actually not arbitrary, just the age old idea of territory & people = power, thowe who already have it will fight for more even if they split people (kurds) and natural infrastructure systems (the ohio river) into fragmented and competing interests.

The Associated Press

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -- A search warrant says employees of an Indiana voter registration group with ties to the Democratic Party submitted several hundred registrations that included false or fraudulent information.

The warrant was unsealed Monday at the request of Patriot Majority, the group at the center of an Indiana State Police investigation. The warrant indicates state police contacted a handful of workers who admitted to falsifying registrations.

Originally Posted by JoMo

The Associated Press

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -- A search warrant says employees of an Indiana voter registration group with ties to the Democratic Party submitted several hundred registrations that included false or fraudulent information.

The warrant was unsealed Monday at the request of Patriot Majority, the group at the center of an Indiana State Police investigation. The warrant indicates state police contacted a handful of workers who admitted to falsifying registrations.

My surprised face.

they can take the electoral college away, that's fine, because hopefully by the time the next vote comes, trump will have taken away at least 3-4 million of their votes.

This is my fav trump video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHdpKT579vI

Originally Posted by JoMo

The Associated Press

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -- A search warrant says employees of an Indiana voter registration group with ties to the Democratic Party submitted several hundred registrations that included false or fraudulent information.

The warrant was unsealed Monday at the request of Patriot Majority, the group at the center of an Indiana State Police investigation. The warrant indicates state police contacted a handful of workers who admitted to falsifying registrations.

ICFIRE wouldn't let this happen in his home town

Damn trump voters are so violent

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Cb_CBJsKZ0

oh, wait, that was an autistic hillary supporter mad this guy stood between him and his chicken tenders

Lucas Abreu on Twitter:

Ted stopped by to check on the delegates...... The delegates Dahnald!

"Donald Trump met privately with Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, at Trump Tower, CNN reports; topic of conversation not clear"