Let them build that fucking Mosque

how is moving the prospective site of a church preventing the exercise of religion?
It's not, at least not directly.

But using government force to prevent a mosque from being built is absolutely a violation of property rights.

And in principle, the reasoning behind that violation is antithetic to the tenets on which this nation was founded.

Al-Qaeda is an Islamic group, so in effect, this is an al-Qaeda mosque.
A duck is a bird, so in effect, a chicken is a duck. DERP

Latter-day Saints are a Christian group, so in effect, a Catholic church is a Mormon church. DERP DERP

LRA is a Christian group, so in effect, a Baptist church is an LRA church. DERP DERP

Positive Christianity is a Christian group, so in effect, .... DERRRRRRP


Never mind. Your logic is immaculate. :lol:
 
Also, I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but we weren't attacked by Islam.
Yes actually, we were. They were good Muslims following the religious texts of Islam. Nothing they did violates the Islam. It's quite the opposite. They are to be revered as the best of Muslims, not extremists.

Extremists are like the people that call themselves Christians (Christ's followers; Christ-like) and then picket soldiers' funerals with "God hates fags!" signs. Those are extremists.

Muslims that kill non-Muslims are doing Allah's work. They are not extremists in the eyes of Islam.
 
Yes actually, we were. They were good Muslims following the religious texts of Islam. Nothing they did violates the Islam. It's quite the opposite. They are to be revered as the best of Muslims, not extremists.

Extremists are like the people that call themselves Christians (Christ's followers; Christ-like) and then picket soldiers' funerals with "God hates fags!" signs. Those are extremists.

Muslims that kill non-Muslims are doing Allah's work. They are not extremists in the eyes of Islam.
Oh, that makes perfect sense.



To someone that is simply uneducated when it comes to Islam.
 
The best part about arguing with Validumb is that people have known he's retarded for years, and yet instead of trying to improve, he just acts like he's smart and looks even dumber.

It's like watching a trainwreck where the conductor is like FUCK IT IF WE GO FASTER AND CLOSE OUR EYES WE MIGHT LIVE
 
:lol: I'm completely immune to your pathetic ad hominem. Attach an argument if you want it to work, children.

Oh, that makes perfect sense.

To someone that is simply uneducated when it comes to Islam.
I like how you can't refute anything I've quoted directly from the Qur'an, but I am the one who is uneducated. :rofl:

Here's just a FEW examples of the Qur'an, because there are literally thousands:

Kill people who won't believe:
"[4.89]They desire that you should disbelieve as they have disbelieved, so that you might be (all) alike; therefore take not from among them friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah's way; but if they turn back, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them, and take not from among them a friend or a helper."

Torture (in some of the worst ways known to man since the Dark Ages) non-Muslims:
"22.19: These are two adversaries who dispute about their Lord; then (as to) those who disbelieve, for them are cut out garments of fire, boiling water shall be poured over their heads."

Deceive non-Muslims:
"6.25 : And of them is he who hearkens to you, and We have cast veils over their hearts lest they understand it and a heaviness into their ears; and even if they see every sign they will not believe in it; so much so that when they come to you they only dispute with you; those who disbelieve say: This is naught but the stories of the ancients.

6.110 : And We will turn their hearts and their sights, even as they did not believe in it the first time, and We will leave them in their inordinacy, blindly wandering on."


Punish non-believers:
"5.33 The Punishment for those who oppose Allah and his messenger is : Execution or Crucifixion or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides or exile from the land."

The list goes on almost forever...

Islam means peace, gais.
 
Last edited:
look i can do it too

1) In Leviticus 25:44-46, the Lord tells the Israelites it’s OK to own slaves, provided they are strangers or heathens.

2) In Samuel 15:2-3, the Lord orders Saul to kill all the Amalekite men, women and infants.

3) In Exodus 15:3, the Bible tells us the Lord is a man of war.

4) In Numbers 31, the Lord tells Moses to kill all the Midianites, sparing only the virgins.

5) In Deuteronomy 13:6-16, the Lord instructs Israel to kill anyone who worships a different god or who worships the Lord differently.

6) In Mark 7:9, Jesus is critical of the Jews for not killing their disobedient children as prescribed by Old Testament law.

7) In Luke 19:22-27, Jesus orders killed anyone who refuses to be ruled by him.
 
:lol: I'm completely immune to your pathetic ad hominem. Attach an argument if you want it to work, children.

I like how you can't refute anything I've quoted directly from the Qur'an, but I am the one who is uneducated. :rofl:



Islam means peace, gais.
I stand to gain nothing by engaging you in a theological debate, much less one about the theology of a religion that you have never studied. The response that I gave you to that post was the response that your argument merits.


You give me an incentive, and I'll respond to each of those point-by-point.
 
It's not, at least not directly.

But using government force to prevent a mosque from being built is absolutely a violation of property rights.

And in principle, the reasoning behind that violation is antithetic to the tenets on which this nation was founded.
nobody is saying it can't be built, they are just saying that the placement is probably not the best place


A duck is a bird, so in effect, a chicken is a duck. DERP
If a chicken flew south for the winter
Latter-day Saints are a Christian group, so in effect, a Catholic church is a Mormon church. DERP DERP

LRA is a Christian group, so in effect, a Baptist church is an LRA church. DERP DERP

Positive Christianity is a Christian group, so in effect, .... DERRRRRRP


Never mind. Your logic is immaculate. :lol:

Except that islam isn't split up like christianity is. There are 3800 identified splinters of christianity. There are 2 main types of muslims, and they still hold the same beliefs though one follows the Qur'an closely, one doesnt, but the core belief is the same

So yeah if its a muslim mosque, its an al-qaeda mosque.
 
Last edited:
Well the way I see it.

The ragheads were speaking in terms of their world, where they lived!
Sure, they too went conquering.....Doesn't just about everyone. If they can do it!

You need a cohesive stable Govt. for out of country war adventurism.
In their way....Religion is at the foundation of their govt.


For our part.
If they don't want the non-Muslin us.
Then we should not want them.

Just buy their shit!
Leave them alone.
Do not allow them here.

Problem solved!

If they want to adventure here to WAR .... Then we just just "Mother of All Bomb" them,
back to the "Camel Age"
 
look i can do it too
:lol: The Old Testament is Jewish crap. The Talmud is also riddled with insane hatred towards non-Jews.

But the two New Testament (Christian, not Jewish like the Old Testament) examples you posted are not only wrong, but taken out of context. In Mark, he's ridiculing the Jewish Pharisees for not following their own religion's rules, and in Luke, he's telling a story about a king, not a command from Jesus himself.

Ah, intellectual dishonesty. The true simpleton's way.

Once again, you're using another religious to somehow justify Islam. Disgusting and pathetic.
 
I stand to gain nothing by engaging you in a theological debate, much less one about the theology of a religion that you have never studied. The response that I gave you to that post was the response that your argument merits.


You give me an incentive, and I'll respond to each of those point-by-point.
Uh, don't be confused. This isn't a debate. This is me dominating the topic by providing facts and evidence.

You're just deflecting, because you're a Muslim apologist.
 
:lol: The Old Testament is Jewish crap. The Talmud is also riddled with insane hatred towards non-Jews.

But the two New Testament (Christian, not Jewish like the Old Testament) examples you posted are not only wrong, but taken out of context. In Mark, he's ridiculing the Jewish Pharisees for not following their own religion's rules, and in Luke, he's telling a story about a king, not a command from Jesus himself.

Ah, intellectual dishonesty. The true simpleton's way.

Once again, you're using another religious to somehow justify Islam. Disgusting and pathetic.
Made me chuckle. :lol:
 
Back
Top