I did some searching for some statistics, gun laws and number of guns don't have the extreme impact that either side of argument wants you to think it has.
I know each side cherry picks stats that help their argument but I think the stats need to be setup side by side with other stats like joblessness rate, income, eduction of people in that area... There are always clusters in spikes in statistics but the causality isn't always clear.
Gun Control - Just Facts When I look at the charts on that site they have some graphs showing strict gun control laws coming into effect and murder rates increasing after that and then the laws being reversed and that is a low point in murders, but if you look at the graphs the declines in murders happened before restrictions on guns were eased back in most cases. Those charts showing murder rates over time don't tell the full story at all.
List of countries by firearm-related death rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Number of guns per capita by country - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Those 2 pages don't help much either (global data isn't all that accurate), yes the US is number one by a long shot for number of guns per capita, but that obviously doesn't tell you how many gun owners there are.
Maybe the key is the high levels of coca cola that is consumed in the US and the number of guns!
Coca-Cola Consumption Per Capita Across The World
Coca-Cola - 2011 Year In Review - Operating Groups
Or maybe it is the combination of fast food, too much sugar in drinks and guns!
These arguments are causing me brain damage, I don't need to get dumber than I already am.