The whole GOP establishment vs Trump seems like something out of WWE. Great way to energize voters to vote. I like how Trump tweeted that Instagram of Hillary and suddenly everyone is picking up on it. He mentioned how twitter was great because he posts something and 10 minutes later, it's BREAKING NEWS on all the networks. He calls the media dishonest, disgusting, liars, and punches them in the eye and they come back for more like abuse victims who can't get enough.

Swallowing is perhaps the only thing he will ever excel at

not surprised that trump is pro life and against abortion

****ing 2016 :rofl:

Uhh, he's running as a Republican, he has to be pro-life (except in cases of ****, incest, or mother's life in danger) in order to get nominated.

I will vote for Bernie if I can, but only because I can't vote for the other two. Hillary is a career criminal politician, Trump is a megalomaniac with no real political experience. Without Bernie in the race, I have no clue who I will vote for, but it definitely won't be Hillary.

My vote is totally worthless because by the time i can vote in the primary it'll probably be down to one candidate anyways.

You act like having no real political experience is a bad thing? Trump wasn't a politician 9 months ago and he's beat the crap out of lifetime politicians.

yah, hillary will be in jail by then

Hillary isn't going to jail...lol

She will incarcerate the rest of America for their dissent against her long before she ever pays one day for her own crimes

I call top bunk

He has a ton of experience talking ****, and he is in no one's pocket, of course he is gonna mop the floor with all these **** heads. I mean real experience as it pertains to running the country. For what it is worth, the small amount of information on his policy platforms that exists, most of it I don't agree with.

I don't fault people for liking Trump, I understand the appeal. At the very least, he is pointing out how ridiculous the Republican party is right now. A lot of disenfranchised conservatives look at him the same way disenfranchised liberals look at Sanders. I honestly wish the guy wasn't such a megalomaniac, I would love to have a guilt free alternative to Clinton.

not surprising for an Australian, but you have no idea how much Hillary is distrusted and outright loathed.

Unfortunately, a lot of American liberals have their heads in the sand. I have friends that told me we need a woman president, now that we have had a black one, and it didn't matter what Hillary had done/said in the past.

the Trump hysteria is just great

too many people don't seem to understand the jurisdiction and role of the executive branch. being potus doesn't make you Caesar.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BDBS8bYGhWr/

This **** is too amazing

OFN

trumps the greatest **** poster

true my OFN **** post pales in comparison /shame

This whole trump thing is pretty damn funny.

1 - The GOP only has themselves to blame for this: they were given Congress to counter owebama and failed to do so. Then they ran romney in 2012 who was a **** candidate that didnt inspire people to get out and vote. Kicking the current ****tard out of office should've been very easy with 4 years of his craptastic presidency.

2 - Proof is in the voting. Yesterday was a catastrophic loss for the Establishment. The only two [GOP] contenders are both hated by the Establishment.

Reminds me that I need more popcorn for this trainwreck. I just need the salty tears of bernie supporters to spruce it up a little.

This statement exemplifies the problem with the establishment. You want a president with political experience? Should you not want a president with leadership experience instead? That is why governors make better presidents - they have executive experience.

The president leads the executive branch of the government. POTUS is also the commander in chief, but if a nominee has no military experience most people don't care. So if it is OK to lead the military and send them into harm's way, why is it not OK to be president if you have no political experience?

For me, I want a person who knows what it takes to lead large organizations, to motivate people, to understand big decisions and not feel compelled to take a poll first to figure out what to do. Politicians do that. Leaders do not.

I want a leader - we have been without one for 8 years.

Of the entire field, I think Trump is best. I hope he asks Petraeus to be SecDef.

Huge difference between running a company and running the country though. Just having "leadership" experience is not enough.

Trump is too qualified, now if he were only a community leader then maybe.

the only "leadership" experience Obama had was a community organizer... I think Trump with his leadership experience in a multi-billion dollar company will be just fine...

the president doesnt run the country

Can you articulate in any way how George W. Bush was a better "leader" than Obama?

this is like comparing a pile of **** with a pile of ****

vote trump you sonsa*****ez

Which is why I'm wondering why he didn't say 16 years, instead of eight.

https://i.chzbgr.com/full/8759290880/h269B1903/

sure, but is there anything I could type here that would make you go "oh, yeah, in that instance he was"?? So why waste my time?

can't resist one though - terrorist attacks US, Bush calls it that, unifies this country, and takes action. Obama refuses to admit terror attacks on the US are even terror attacks (unless it is a white guy in a church...then it is). He is divisive and neither practices or supports american values. The reason? he worries more about offending Islam and other countries than his own citizens. he went on a world tour apologizing for the evil USA.

**** Obama

Oh **** off, everything he did in response to 9/11 was idiotic and stripped Americans of rights and plunged our country into endless war at a ****ing staggering economic cost to the US and the world.

so when islamic fundamentalists started flying airliners full of people into buildings what would you have done as president

mother of god :(

Maybe he could've done something differently but then everyone would've called him a massive *****.

Yes, yes, I am quite aware of what the executive branch does. "Running the country" is a euphemism, don't be pedantic.

Sure, if you had a legitimate example.
He was warned a month before 9/11, but didn't "take action" to prevent it. After it happened, we invade Iraq and destabilize their government even though they had no WMDs or connection to AQ. He signed the USA PATRIOT Act into law right after invading Afghanistan and blew his chance at taking out bin Laden in 12/2001.
You mean like the Benghazi attack? Or the San Bernadino attack? Or maybe Fort Hood?

I'm seeing a double standard here. Dyan Roof wasn't a terrorist because he's white? He didn't call the others "terrorist attacks" soon enough? He should be calling more of these shootings "terrorist attacks"?
We get it. You hate this ****** in the White House who was "commander in chief" when we finally took out bin Laden and brought your brothers home from Afghanistan. This "divisive" ****** is letting gays in your military and keeping boots of the ground in Syria.

It's one thing to hate Obama. It's totally delusional to think W was by any metric better.

I'm pretty sure though if Trump were elected we'd have another war to make you happy. It's good for business (if your business is in the military industrial complex).

well thats kind of the point right?

obama couldnt even close gitmo.

what do people really think trump can do? it pretty hilarious

WE HAVE TO STOP TRUMP!!!! BECAUSE REASONS!!!!!! STOP HIM NOW, ARGHGHHHGHH!

How is that the point? It literally has nothing to do with what I was saying. Trump has no real experience with the large majority of presidential responsibilities. I would be more willing to overlook that, if I agreed with his platform. It isn't that difficult, he checks very few of the boxes for me.

Though this wasn't my point, it less about what Trump can do, and more so about what he can't.