Quote:
Originally Posted by LouCypher
(Post 18563788)
Fool asserts liberal representation has increased in universities and higher education because they've "lowered the bar" for entry and make it easy to get loans.
Now if that's the case, that's a situation that would benefit everyone equally, if they're interested in going to college. So it would reason that the representation should reflect what is found in the general populace.
|
Easy loans means the college have little to no reason to reduce costs. The cost of tuition and housing continues to rise well above that of inflation, and has done so since the 70s. Their consumers are uninformed highschool children who sign up for a lifetime of non-dischargeable debt, doing so on the advice of retarded guidance counselors and the liberal bourgeois. In order to take full advantage of their uninformed consumers, colleges lower the bar and create retarded and useless disciplines like mythological communication. The idea that encouraging naive youngsters to rack up monsterous 200k plus debt in useless disciplines should be encouraged rather than criminalized is appalling.
It used to be that someone could easily pay off tuition with a part time job + summer work while going through college. With illegal immigration plus current college costs, that is impossible. Thanks liberals, for making college unaffordable by trying to make it more affordable.
For some reason, liberals look at payday loans and rightly see usury. But when benefits liberal college professors and can't be removed through bankruptcy, then its ok.
|