Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
TribalWar Forums
Page 45 of 127

TribalWar Forums (https://www.tribalwar.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussion (https://www.tribalwar.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Godzilla! Huge Earthquake in Japan (https://www.tribalwar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=629593)

HumDumpin 03-12-2011 20:47

Don't worry about it, they're the safest things in the world. Only a couple have gone ape**** out of control, ever.

[Golbez-RG-] 03-12-2011 20:50

It's ironic because they get so bent out of shape every time we have a nuclear naval vessel dock in Japan.

JoMo 03-12-2011 20:50

The legal limit for radioactivity has been passed at the Fukushima plant, AFP says, quoting Japan's Kyodo news agency.

HumDumpin 03-12-2011 20:51

Uh oh, they're in violation, they HAVE to stop now!

JoMo 03-12-2011 20:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by DealyRrunk (Post 16270183)
Uh oh, they're in violation, they HAVE to stop now!

I expect a strongly worded letter from the UN!

MC Hamster 03-12-2011 20:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by [Golbez-RG-] (Post 16270161)
You do have to wonder of the wisdom of putting 6 nuclear reactors on a tsunami beach in one of the most active areas on the face of the Earth.

Well... in the face of an offshore 9.1 quake, any beach is a "tsunami beach"... and an awful lot of Japan is beach, and Nuclear plants need a lot of water.

And with the amount of power that Japan consumes, and the amount of real estate it consumes, it's not particularly viable to power the nation by wind farms. Nuclear plants provide a lot of power in a small footprint.

I think Japan's actually slated as the site for the world's first "commercially viable" fusion plant, last I checked.

Anguish 03-12-2011 20:55

maybe a documentry. might go viral.

Special---K 03-12-2011 21:38

holy ****
Anguish siting

mjoe 03-12-2011 21:40

http://static.infowars.com/2011/03/i.../jetstream.png

Heat 03-12-2011 21:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dangerdoggie (Post 16269543)
Print some money, put people to work, worry about the exploding debt later.

Obamanomics.

[Golbez-RG-] 03-12-2011 21:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by MC Hamster (Post 16270187)
Well... in the face of an offshore 9.1 quake, any beach is a "tsunami beach"... and an awful lot of Japan is beach, and Nuclear plants need a lot of water.

And with the amount of power that Japan consumes, and the amount of real estate it consumes, it's not particularly viable to power the nation by wind farms. Nuclear plants provide a lot of power in a small footprint.

I think Japan's actually slated as the site for the world's first "commercially viable" fusion plant, last I checked.

Whats wrong with putting it near an inland body of water? Why not make a man made body of water for cooling like we do on a lot of plants here? The whole west coast of Japan is known for Tsunamis probably more so than anywhere else on Earth.

Even if you did put it on the beach like they did, why not raise the backup generators for cooling well above a tsunami's reach? I know one plant in Cali is exactly the same way, you see it driving between San Diego and LA, so if Cali ever has a major tsunami the same situation is likely to arise.

JoMo 03-12-2011 21:50

ruh roh......

Top of MOX fuel rods 3 meters above water.

radiation at 1,204 micro sievert.

MC Hamster 03-12-2011 21:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by [Golbez-RG-] (Post 16270270)
Whats wrong with putting it near an inland body of water? Why not make a man made body of water for cooling like we do on a lot of plants here? The whole west coast of Japan is known for Tsunamis probably more so than anywhere else on Earth.

Even if you did put it on the beach like they did, why not raise the backup generators for cooling well above a tsunami's reach? I know one plant in Cali is exactly the same way, you see it driving between San Diego and LA, so if Cali ever has a major tsunami the same situation is likely to arise.

:shrug: cost?

I'm not trying to defend it, just suggesting some of the reasoning that might have gone into the decisions. No matter where you put it in Japan, there's going to be problems, and I don't think there's much around that's designed with disasters of this magnitude in mind.

JoMo 03-12-2011 22:04

BREAKING NEWS: AP: Meltdown likely under way at second reactor, Japan government says

Xcursion 03-12-2011 22:06

They're wrong. LGBR said everything will be fine. I take his word for it since some girl he ****ed said so. HE HAS THE WORD FROM THE STREETS DAWG!

JoMo 03-12-2011 22:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xcursion (Post 16270302)
They're wrong. LGBR said everything will be fine. I take his word for it since some girl he ****ed said so. HE HAS THE WORD FROM THE STREETS DAWG!

i thought it was based on his american facebook friends that don't wake up until the middle of the afternoon over there.

Huscarl 03-12-2011 22:09

God damn.

And apparently in California, Santa Cruz's harbor got wrecked along with Crescent City.

Tsunami Figures from Santa Cruz Harbor - Santa Cruz, CA Patch

ICMeltdown 03-12-2011 22:12

Japan struggles with nuclear reactors in wake of quake - CNN.com

Xcursion 03-12-2011 22:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoMo (Post 16270304)
i thought it was based on his american facebook friends that don't wake up until the middle of the afternoon over there.

Either way, he's got the inside scoop on what's really going on over there. Just like how he had the inside scoop of how credit cards work in that big thread before.

[Golbez-RG-] 03-12-2011 22:18

Heh funny looks like CNN used a PWR not a BWR graphic


Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:41.
Page 45 of 127

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2003, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright 1999-2020 Tribalwar.Com, LLC