SAW II

S

SlotR

Veteran XX

• Oct 2, 2006

• #1

is it necessary that I see saw I before I watch pt II

 

N

nolt

Veteran XX

• Oct 2, 2006

• #2

what do you think seriously?

 

S

SlotR

Veteran XX

• Oct 2, 2006

• #3

I watched all the rocky's out of order, that didnt fucking matter now did it

 

L

Loco-Raider

Contributor

Veteran XV

• Oct 2, 2006

• #4

Actually, yes. It would be a great idea.

 

V

vawlk

Contributor

Veteran XX

• Oct 2, 2006

• #5

i concur. While you don't have to, it makes the movie much more enjoyable.

 

K

-Kapion-

Complete Fag

Veteran X

• Oct 2, 2006

• #6

anyone who thinks it isnt necessary is purebred retarded

 

S

SlotR

Veteran XX

• Oct 2, 2006

• #7

-Kapion- said:

anyone who thinks it isnt necessary is purebred retarded

Click to expand...

interesting

 

C

confidential

Veteran X

• Oct 2, 2006

• #8

it's not absolutely necessary, saw ii can stand on its own.. but it's worth it to watch saw i

 

N

nolt

Veteran XX

• Oct 2, 2006

• #9

i think its necessary that slotr watch 'problem child' and 'problem child 2' before watching either saw movie.

 

S

SuicideSnowman

Veteran XV

• Oct 2, 2006

• #10

shitty overrated movies

 

Beren

TribalWar Aussie

Veteran XX

• Oct 2, 2006

• #11

I think its best to watch the preceeding ones before the next one. There is continuiety there with the chick's character.

 

S

SlotR

Veteran XX

• Oct 2, 2006

• #12

SuicideSnowman said:

shitty overrated movies

Click to expand...

this was my hunch

 

S

SuicideSnowman

Veteran XV

• Oct 2, 2006

• #13

I'll admit the first one was somewhat interesting. I liked the idea behind it and it was actually somewhat original, but then there was a sequal a year later and now another sequal another year later. Give it up already.