Does anybody actually agree with this? by Flash - TribalWar Forums
Click Here to find great hosting deals from Branzone.com


Go Back   TribalWar Forums > TribalWar Community > General Discussion
Reload this Page Does anybody actually agree with this?
Page 1 of 24
Thread Tools
Flash
VeteranXV
Old
1 - 12-29-2017, 12:12 PM
Reply With Quote
http://kutv.com/news/nation-world/co...for-gay-couple

Society worked this out on their own. They lost their business... Why is the government charging people 135k for having a different belief system?
 
Flash is offline
 
Sponsored Links
Plasmatic
VeteranX
Old
2 - 12-29-2017, 12:22 PM
Reply With Quote
no
 
Plasmatic is offline
 
BeLiaL
VeteranXV
Old
3 - 12-29-2017, 12:23 PM
Reply With Quote
welcome to society run by the mentally ill
 
BeLiaL is offline
 
Plasmatic
VeteranX
Old
4 - 12-29-2017, 12:25 PM
Reply With Quote
This could get fun now that we're forcing artists to perform for anyone.
 
Plasmatic is offline
 
amRam
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
5 - 12-29-2017, 12:46 PM
Reply With Quote
Wait isn't this **** in the SCOTUS right now?
 
amRam is online now
 
samUwell
VeteranX
Contributor
Old
6 - 12-29-2017, 12:50 PM
Reply With Quote
Everyone should have the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason at all. No one has the right to force another person to labor for them, whether they are paid for that labor or not.

While turning away work is a horrible business decision, everyone should have that right. We have companies like google, facebook, twatter, youtube etc. banning people from posting due to opinions the corporations don't agree with, so how can the government force the little people to do something for someone else that has a differing opinion?

If those corporations have a right to turn away customers, we should also have that right. Because 'clicks' to internet businesses are business, its no different than a fricken cake. So if little people must labor for someone else, the internet companies cannot ban people for opposing opinions.
 
samUwell is offline
 
bowl of blood
Veteran4
Contributor
Old
7 - 12-29-2017, 12:59 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by amRam View Post
Wait isn't this **** in the SCOTUS right now?
that one is from colorado, this is a different gay cake
 
bowl of blood is offline
 
amRam
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
8 - 12-29-2017, 01:00 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowl of blood View Post
that one is from colorado, this is a different gay cake
Ok but same decision effectively. I think they already heard the arguments. How long do decisions typically take in SCOTUS
 
amRam is online now
 
jgrange
Veteran5
Old
9 - 12-29-2017, 01:34 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash View Post
http://kutv.com/news/nation-world/co...for-gay-couple

Society worked this out on their own. They lost their business... Why is the government charging people 135k for having a different belief system?

It doesn't pay to be ignorant. MAGA
 
jgrange is offline
 
bowl of blood
Veteran4
Contributor
Old
10 - 12-29-2017, 01:39 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by amRam View Post
Ok but same decision effectively. I think they already heard the arguments. How long do decisions typically take in SCOTUS
like 2 years about
 
bowl of blood is offline
 
coombz
VeteranXV
Old
11 - 12-29-2017, 01:39 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash View Post
Why is the government charging people 135k for having a different belief system?
i think i read somewhere that the massive fine for damages is because the bakery bigots doxxed the gay couple on social media etc

but someone who actually cares would have to check and confirm that

if there are two cases like this going on i could very well be confused
 
coombz is offline
 
BeLiaL
VeteranXV
Old
12 - 12-29-2017, 01:55 PM
Reply With Quote
i have a really hard time trying to understand discrimination protections

what about the people on the other end? the bakers' religious protection was encroached upon

as far as i knew, private businesses have the right to refuse service to anyone, which is why some stores make you leave for carrying a concealed weapon, even though it's not illegal to CCW

sexual orientation is protected but rights are not?


and i mean, it is a very slippery slope, because if there weren't protections in place, all of the corporations and wealthy people could decide to stop serving minorities, and they would be ****ed... and without the gov't intervening, there's nothing anyone could do
 
BeLiaL is offline
 
amRam
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
13 - 12-29-2017, 01:59 PM
Reply With Quote
What's worse is they only refused to sell them a specific product. From what I understand they were not refused service entirely.
 
amRam is online now
 
JuggerNaught
AIDs Water5
Old
14 - 12-29-2017, 02:00 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by amRam View Post
Ok but same decision effectively. I think they already heard the arguments. How long do decisions typically take in SCOTUS
They have been split on it since the first of december
 
JuggerNaught is offline
 
amRam
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
15 - 12-29-2017, 02:01 PM
Reply With Quote
Split? Aren't there 9 of em
 
amRam is online now
 
Dangerdoggie
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
16 - 12-29-2017, 02:06 PM
Reply With Quote
Should have just baked them a fart cake.
 
Dangerdoggie is offline
 
Captain Tele
Veteran
Immigrant
Old
17 - 12-29-2017, 02:08 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgrange View Post
It doesn't pay to be ignorant. MAGA
not only does it pay

it pays rather well

almost as good as what you make

in this specific case far better
 
Captain Tele is offline
 
Captain Tele
Veteran
Immigrant
Old
18 - 12-29-2017, 02:09 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeLiaL View Post
i have a really hard time trying to understand discrimination protections

what about the people on the other end? the bakers' religious protection was encroached upon

as far as i knew, private businesses have the right to refuse service to anyone, which is why some stores make you leave for carrying a concealed weapon, even though it's not illegal to CCW

sexual orientation is protected but rights are not?


and i mean, it is a very slippery slope, because if there weren't protections in place, all of the corporations and wealthy people could decide to stop serving minorities, and they would be ****ed... and without the gov't intervening, there's nothing anyone could do
and without them we wouldn't be able to determine and demand who is first or second class citizens inside your own country that your ancestors built and your family has spent generations inside

 
Captain Tele is offline
 
T-Dawg
VeteranX
Old
19 - 12-29-2017, 02:09 PM
Reply With Quote
Make a cake using anal lube instead of butter/oil.

Sent from my XT1609 using Tapatalk
 
T-Dawg is offline
 
Captain Tele
Veteran
Immigrant
Old
20 - 12-29-2017, 02:10 PM
Reply With Quote
and now more from out talking cat lady on why canada yet again found new limits to cuck on and over

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y70Q6tQQmw

the west coast is hellbent for this same path

now imagine if a gay couple pulled this **** at an islamic bakery in the same area.........LOLOLOLOLOLO
 
Captain Tele is offline
 
Page 1 of 24
Reply


Go Back   TribalWar Forums > TribalWar Community > General Discussion
Reload this Page Does anybody actually agree with this?

Social Website Bullshit

Tags
serial rapist of chicago

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

AGENT: CCBot/2.0 (http://commoncrawl.org/faq/) / Y
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 PM.