Will we ever go to war with North Korea? by |R|u|s|t|y| - Page 6 - TribalWar Forums
Click Here to find great hosting deals from Branzone.com


Go Back   TribalWar Forums > TribalWar Community > General Discussion
Reload this Page Will we ever go to war with North Korea?
Page 6 of 7
Thread Tools
arsin
Veteran++
Old
101 - 09-17-2017, 12:02 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkittleBrew View Post
Bullshhit. Our nuclear arsenal is for MAD purposes only. No 1st world country will ever use a nuke again unless we're talking about a WWIII end of the world scenario.
MIIC is spending billions on "micro nukes" in an effort to enable the use of nukes on battlefields.

Such is the psychopathy of



This building coerces American's to spend $900,000,000,000 a year to support it. Most American's are only too eager to do so

Talk about getting "OWNED."
 
arsin is offline
 
Last edited by arsin; 09-17-2017 at 12:17 PM.
Sponsored Links
JuggerNaught
AIDs Water5
Old
102 - 09-17-2017, 12:08 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by absent View Post
It actually makes perfect sense. Do you not understand the geopolitics of the region out of stupidity or intentionally? China was seen as likely willing to militarily defend NK for a long time. That has changed, and now NK has nukes, which they won't give up as they've seen that the US does not negotiate in good faith and does not honor any agreements (Iraq, Libya). NK has tried negotiating in the past, only to always be rebuffed by the US. Now, they will saber rattle to prove a credible threat.
yeah, not really. NK has threatened, bullied, attempted to coerce, but never 'negotiate'
 
JuggerNaught is online now
 
arsin
Veteran++
Old
103 - 09-17-2017, 12:27 PM
Reply With Quote
It's not so well known that the US and NK came to an agreement about nukes in the 90's. Though I don't recall the details the US didn't live up to its end of the bargain (see Libya, Iraq) so NK started it's nuke program again.

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/...-a7876446.html

Quote:
We're going to let the Koreans get nukes, enemies justify MIIC.
- General Westmoreland
 
arsin is offline
 
bowl of blood
Veteran
Contributor
Old
104 - 09-17-2017, 01:58 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by arsin View Post
MIIC is spending billions on "micro nukes" in an effort to enable the use of nukes on battlefields.

Such is the psychopathy of



This building coerces American's to spend $900,000,000,000 a year to support it. Most American's are only too eager to do so

Talk about getting "OWNED."
tactical nukes ("mini" lol) have been available to the us military since the 1950s, they were ultimately deemed a poor alternative to other battlefield and aerial weapons

why a low-yield nuke is so terrifying is something only your retard brain could comprehend
 
bowl of blood is offline
 
arsin
Veteran++
Old
105 - 09-19-2017, 08:16 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowl of blood View Post
tactical nukes ("mini" lol) have been available to the us military since the 1950s, they were ultimately deemed a poor alternative to other battlefield and aerial weapons

why a low-yield nuke is so terrifying is something only your retard brain could comprehend
They didn't have "micro nukes" in the 50's.
 
arsin is offline
 
JuggerNaught
AIDs Water5
Old
106 - 09-19-2017, 08:23 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by arsin View Post
They didn't have "micro nukes" in the 50's.


The Davey Crockett
 
JuggerNaught is online now
 
arsin
Veteran++
Old
107 - 09-19-2017, 08:27 PM
Reply With Quote
Welst, the NY Times says that the US didn't have micro nukes until recently. Ok?
 
arsin is offline
 
SuperTrap
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
108 - 09-22-2017, 11:33 AM
Reply With Quote
Rep. Hunter calls for preemptive strike against North Korea - The San Diego Union-Tribune

Almost ready

 
SuperTrap is offline
 
DV
VeteranXV
Old
109 - 09-22-2017, 12:36 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by arsin View Post
Welst, the NY Times says that the US didn't have micro nukes until recently. Ok?
Well believe it or not... the New York Times was incorrect.
 
DV is offline
 
samUwell
VeteranX
Contributor
Old
110 - 09-22-2017, 01:41 PM
Reply With Quote
Imagine that.

Shocked I tell you. Shocked!
 
samUwell is offline
 
Hellsfury
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
111 - 09-22-2017, 02:24 PM
Reply With Quote
SO... what happens when you topple the NK Regime and you suddenly create 25 million refugees?

I mean... they already have a wall... but, what about the humanitarian disaster that follows ?

How many South Korean's do we have to sacrifice to end North Korea? I think that is what has allowed this circus to persist, ending it will cost South Korea far more than it does North Korea. At some point we crossed the line between if we could win the war, and if we can afford to win the war.
 
Hellsfury is offline
 
Last edited by Hellsfury; 09-22-2017 at 04:20 PM.
Reaver
VeteranXV
Old
112 - 09-22-2017, 02:45 PM
Reply With Quote
I hope it doesn't come down to war. I really love SK. A real tragedy if it comes to pass.
 
Reaver is offline
 
Dangerdoggie
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
113 - 09-22-2017, 02:50 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellsfury View Post
SO... what happens why you topple the NK Regime and you suddenly create 25 million refugees?

I mean... they already have a wall... but, what about the humanitarian disaster that follows ?

How many South Korean's do we have to sacrifice to end North Korea? I think that is what has allow this circus to persist, ending it will cost South Korea far more than it does North Korea. At some point we crossed the line between if we could win the war, and if we can afford to win the war.
We bring them all to the US of course.
 
Dangerdoggie is offline
 
HaPpY
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
114 - 09-22-2017, 03:07 PM
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkittleBrew View Post
Bullshhit. Our nuclear arsenal is for MAD purposes only. No 1st world country will ever use a nuke again unless we're talking about a WWIII end of the world scenario.
except the jews have been nuking yemen only a few years ago lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Bi3py0Y_vg
 
HaPpY is online now
 
TheVoiceOfReason
Veteran++
Contributor
Old
115 - 09-22-2017, 03:32 PM
Reply With Quote
Mmmm, tasty conspiranoia.
 
TheVoiceOfReason is offline
 
HaPpY
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
116 - 09-22-2017, 03:39 PM
Reply With Quote
lol conspiracy theory?... google "yemen nuke" theres hundreds of sources and videos.

thinking everything is "just a conspiracy theory" is about as retarded as believing in every conspiracy theory. you're a mindless twat either way
 
HaPpY is online now
 
Flipp
Veteran
Old
117 - 09-22-2017, 04:09 PM
Reply With Quote
needa nuke n korea asap no matta bout s korea if dey die dey die
 
Flipp is offline
 
ArakAtak
VeteranX
Contributor
Old
118 - 09-22-2017, 04:12 PM
Reply With Quote
Everyone loves Korean BBQ
 
ArakAtak is offline
 
Dangerdoggie
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
119 - 09-22-2017, 04:14 PM
Reply With Quote
samsung nooooooooooo

without china giving the green light (never going to happen) we can't first strike.

America right now is made in China.
 
Dangerdoggie is offline
 
Ddrakon
VeteranX
Old
120 - 09-22-2017, 04:56 PM
Reply With Quote
seoul gonna get vaporized by artillery pretty soon
 
Ddrakon is offline
 
Page 6 of 7
Reply


Go Back   TribalWar Forums > TribalWar Community > General Discussion
Reload this Page Will we ever go to war with North Korea?

Social Website Bullshit

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

AGENT: CCBot/2.0 (http://commoncrawl.org/faq/) / Y
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 PM.