VeteranXX Contributor
|
49781 - 10-19-2017, 14:15
|
|
How do gun laws address the failure of the current system? You want to give that flawed system complete control?
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
49782 - 10-19-2017, 14:19
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaol
~60% of guns used in crimes in chicago were purchased outside of illinois (indiana being source #1)
|
that was his point- he's trolling. he doesn't care about your opinion cuz he knows the truth, and frankly you might appear tone deaf to some for taking the bait. i feel like bush Iraq 2003 all over again.
you can't argue against them, since they use troll armor and your stupid for even trying heuheuhehuh. that is not to say they don't partially believe some of it but these are the same posters saying "damn i wish we could kill all the leftists"
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
49783 - 10-19-2017, 14:20
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperTrap
How do gun laws address the failure of the current system? You want to give that flawed system complete control?
|
are they really trolling or is it Memorex?
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
49784 - 10-19-2017, 14:22
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperTrap
Bumps stocks do not violate that definition. Therefore they can not be classified as illegal without rewriting the law... right?
|
i am against any new laws if i have to pay congress to enact them with my taxes. starve this abortion-dodging social security safety net until it's small enough to drown in a bathtub
-grover norquist
|
|
|
VeteranXV Contributor
|
49785 - 10-19-2017, 14:25
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ender
read some history says the fat neckbeard nerdvirgin.
|
nice argument, herpes
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
49786 - 10-19-2017, 14:25
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeLiaL
to be fair, most of that has nothing to do with the gun laws and everything to do with professionals not taking situations seriously
|
unless i'm being super secret double reverse trolled, I think STrap has finally coming around to the realization that maybe a new law could compel police to treat these complaints seriously.
i'd hate to be on the wrong side of a poorly timed/phrased threat.
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
49787 - 10-19-2017, 14:26
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by clu
that was his point- he's trolling. he doesn't care about your opinion cuz he knows the truth, and frankly you might appear tone deaf to some for taking the bait. i feel like bush Iraq 2003 all over again.
you can't argue against them, since they use troll armor and your stupid for even trying heuheuhehuh. that is not to say they don't partially believe some of it but these are the same posters saying "damn i wish we could kill all the leftists"
|
I think it's a little naive to assume SS doesn't believe the **** he's spewing. "LOL chiraq gun regulation is invalid" is broadcast all over right-wing media.
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
49788 - 10-19-2017, 14:29
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaol
I think it's a little naive to assume SS doesn't believe the **** he's spewing. "LOL chiraq gun regulation is invalid" is broadcast all over right-wing media.
|
you would be surprised - it pains me to admit that *very generally speaking* conservatives tend to be funnier or more inclined to joke like this - literally to see someone "reeee!"
it is a crap shoot though a lot of them are - misinformed?
edit- regarding seeing this all over right wing media... IMO this is just TPTB keeping the dumb****s in line. after being on this tribalwar form for - 17 years? i'm convinced that for the smart ones, a lot of their positions are espoused with the small desire to see an emotional reaction while the remainder is simple run of the mill maliciousness. I.E. fool
edit- for clarity
|
|
Last edited by clu; 10-19-2017 at 18:05..
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
49789 - 10-19-2017, 14:31
|
|
:50000repliesbymidnight:
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
49790 - 10-19-2017, 14:34
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by clu
you would be surprised - it pains me to admit that *very generally speaking* conservatives tend to be funnier or more inclined to joke like this - literally to see someone "reeee!"
it is a crap shoot though a lot of them are - misinformed?
|
haha nah on this board Captain Tele is the only one who openly admits that he doesn't really take what he says seriously (and that the people who do are all idiots). SuperTrap too I guess, but I don't think that really counts as trolling because he's just so 'special'
people like Validuz, havax and SS actually believe the **** they post
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
49791 - 10-19-2017, 14:35
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Dawg
:50000repliesbymidnight:
|
it is not fair it is rasis - I was double bated by the masters supertrap (?) and SS
|
|
|
Whiny BitchX Contributor
|
49792 - 10-19-2017, 14:42
|
|
At the risk of sounding hyperbolic, I demand that the fascist Trump administration disarm the entire country.
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
49793 - 10-19-2017, 14:45
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coombz
people like Validuz, havax and SS actually believe the **** they post
|
victims of 100iq be sure to pour out a little beer in memory
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
49794 - 10-19-2017, 14:49
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackpeople
NEXT WAR: MERRY XMAS OR HAPPY HOLIDAYS
|
No doubt he'll rage about it.
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
49795 - 10-19-2017, 14:53
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by clu
i am against any new laws if i have to pay congress to enact them with my taxes. starve this abortion-dodging social security safety net until it's small enough to drown in a bathtub
-grover norquist
|
What law *******? Do we ban string and rubber bands within 50 yards of semi-automatic weapons?
When you change the law you need to redefine the difference between full and semi... how do you do that and get enough support?
AW ban cost the dems big time. You act like I am dictating how this works.. I am not bro. I am trying to explain it to your dumbass.
Now you want to try a logical argument or do you want to go this route.. either way for me *******.
|
|
|
VeteranXV Contributor
|
49796 - 10-19-2017, 15:09
|
|
and you really believe you are super intelligent lol
when all you've ever proven is to be a hypocrite liar, always taking the leftist side, but never claiming to be "leftist"
|
|
Last edited by havax; 10-19-2017 at 15:11..
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
49797 - 10-19-2017, 15:12
|
|
Should we try to tackle the suppressor side of that vid? I know it is almost impossible with half the ****ing country believing someone is going to sneak into a room with a silencer and everyone will be dead before anyone hears a shot.
|
|
|
VeteranXV Contributor
|
49798 - 10-19-2017, 15:12
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperTrap
What law *******? Do we ban string and rubber bands within 50 yards of semi-automatic weapons?
When you change the law you need to redefine the difference between full and semi... how do you do that and get enough support?
AW ban cost the dems big time. You act like I am dictating how this works.. I am not bro. I am trying to explain it to your dumbass.
Now you want to try a logical argument or do you want to go this route.. either way for me *******.
|
give it up bro
clu is sub 70 iq retard
always has been
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
49799 - 10-19-2017, 15:21
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperTrap
What law *******? Do we ban string and rubber bands within 50 yards of semi-automatic weapons?
When you change the law you need to redefine the difference between full and semi... how do you do that and get enough support?
AW ban cost the dems big time. You act like I am dictating how this works.. I am not bro. I am trying to explain it to your dumbass.
Now you want to try a logical argument or do you want to go this route.. either way for me *******.
|
what new law? did you read your post that I quoted? all I was saying was I don't support new laws. **** another reverse troll and master bait
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperTrap
TBF I see no use to bump stocks. To ban them though takes a rewrite of the laws that define automatic from semi-automatics.
That is the definition given in the law.
Bumps stocks do not violate that definition. Therefore they can not be classified as illegal without rewriting the law... right?
|
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
49800 - 10-19-2017, 15:22
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperTrap
What law *******? Do we ban string and rubber bands within 50 yards of semi-automatic weapons?
|
Why do you feel we have to rewrite the law? Why can't there be another that makes certain equipment illegal, especially when it's specifically designed to turn semis into "autos"? It's really not that difficult.
Quote:
When you change the law you need to redefine the difference between full and semi... how do you do that and get enough support?
|
Why? See above.
Quote:
AW ban cost the dems big time. You act like I am dictating how this works.. I am not bro. I am trying to explain it to your dumbass.
|
Some people don't care about partisan politics and would rather see [what they consider] good legislature passed, regardless of who controls the House, or whatever, afterward.
|
|
|
Tags
|
#trump2018
,
'tism tantrum
,
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
,
absentthecuck
,
ban dare
,
but her emails
,
cael cuck crying cockgobbler
,
cael cuckersaurus rex
,
cael the triggered
,
captain taxleach
,
ching chong cael melting
,
coombz=actual shit 4 brains
,
crypto-nazi thread
,
cuck bannon
,
dutch embarrassment
,
eric skogland remax
,
havax getting tagged to hr
,
havax= actual shit for brains
,
i'm jimmy pop
,
it was a grift all along
,
jeffrey kaminskas
,
kale is for cucks
,
kiint = michael
,
kiint_the_fat_cunt
,
maga
,
patriots >*
,
seriously ban dare
,
shit flinging trumpet monkeys
,
shitlibs
,
simina mihaela bonner
,
sperg thread
,
trump going to prison
,
trump justice warriors
,
vanster chokes women
,
vanster is still an idiot
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 26 (0 members and 26 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
AGENT: claudebot / Y
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:57.
|