who was it?
Fling

Originally Posted by Rayn

Banned, thanks.

this is either a joke or someone with a massive cock wedged up his ass.


I'm leaning toward massive cock wedged into said ass

Originally Posted by washington_irving

http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/obscene.html

you'll notice that it says "broadcast" as in television or radio

Originally Posted by Hugh Jazz

You can't be serious. Why else would they have a website and e-mail address to complain to?

some people just don't get it

yes let us in on the secret

:[

I hope Ryan did an IP ban, but someone was probably doing it from their gf's computer. Not a bad idea actually so she can't see what he's posting.

http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/obscene.html

Obscene speech is not protected by the First Amendment and cannot be broadcast at any time. To be obscene, material must meet a three-prong test:

-An average person, applying contemporary community standards, must find that the material, as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
-The material must depict or describe, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable law; and
-The material, taken as a whole, must lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

This website has SO MUCH scientific value. I don't know what the **** HE was talking about. I still say he gets his ass kicked everyday for being a whiny twat.

it's RAYN, not RYAN

Should I bust out my 1st amendment law book and point out all the reasons why the FCC wouldn't give a **** about this?

What a dip ****.

This thread is now about saf http://www.tribalwar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=392779

Originally Posted by washington_irving

http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/obscene.html

Obscene speech is not protected by the First Amendment and cannot be broadcast at any time. To be obscene, material must meet a three-prong test:

-An average person, applying contemporary community standards, must find that the material, as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
-The material must depict or describe, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable law; and
-The material, taken as a whole, must lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

The website isn't being broadcast, therefore it doesn't fall under this.

Originally Posted by xpdnc

The website isn't being broadcast, therefore it doesn't fall under this.

my point exactly

Loco, you're about || this far from joining Hugh if you don't stfu... TW is NOT A BROADCAST STATION

Originally Posted by xpdnc

The website isn't being broadcast, therefore it doesn't fall under this.

sadly it would. Every once and a while they use the obscenity laws to go after porn companies that make extreme porn (i.e. depicted ****).

TW doesn't have anythign strong enough to warrant them doing it though and they only try and go after those kind of charges rarely for chritian lobby groups.

ok then, i'm off to bed

wow this was so exciting

Originally Posted by Darkstrand

sadly it would. Every once and a while they use the obscenity laws to go after porn companies that make extreme porn (i.e. depicted ****).

Perhaps there are other laws, but I've never heard of the FCC being used to take down **** sites