VeteranXX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cogzinofa
challenging votes and then tossing them out is not the same as changing them or overruling the vote count.
|
I have no idea what you are saying.
On Jan 6 the votes will be delivered to Congress. They will be opened and counted. any faithless electors can be challenged at that time by one member of the house and one of the senate. then the house and senate vote to reject the votes or not. If there is no majority winner after the challenges then the house picks the president and the senate picks the VP.
|
|
|
Veteran³ Immigrant
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NightTrain
|
she doing it wrong
so much salt and she isn't harvesting
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
I think I saw a bum that looked like that in SF.
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NightTrain
I have no idea what you are saying.
On Jan 6 the votes will be delivered to Congress. They will be opened and counted. any faithless electors can be challenged at that time by one member of the house and one of the senate. then the house and senate vote to reject the votes or not. If there is no majority winner after the challenges then the house picks the president and the senate picks the VP.
|
I said exactly what you said. I don't know why this is so hard.
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
Don't scare me like that.
Gott damn
Jake, from State Farm
|
|
|
VeteranXV Immigrant
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NightTrain
|
That's it, folks. This thread has been won. Pack it up.
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cogzinofa
I said exactly what you said. I don't know why this is so hard.
|
You said this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by cogzinofa
The amusing thing about faithless electors is that it's perfectly legal for them to vote for any candidate regardless of the results in their state and the resulting winner of that election would legally be the president of the united States. And Congress has no authority to tell them to take a do over.
|
If faithless electors choose Hillary, Congress has the authority to invalidate every vote and then choose the president IOW "the winner of that election" would NOT legally be the president unless Congress decided not to challenge the electoral votes which I can assure you they would.
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NightTrain
You said this:
If faithless electors choose Hillary, Congress has the authority to invalidate every vote and then choose the president IOW "the winner of that election" would NOT legally be the president unless Congress decided not to challenge the electoral votes which I can assure you they would.
|
yeah, and what's your point? the electors could change their votes, choose a different president, and it would be legal. congress could accept those votes and then wow, the outcome is changed and still legal. sure, congress could challenge the votes, toss them out, and then have their own election...but nothing I said was incorrect.
you seem triggered. did you have a hard day at the office?
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoMo
It's the dark side manifesting itself.......
|
More like pets starting to look like their owners.
|
|
|
Veteran³ Immigrant
|
only dumb rednecks voted for Trump
heheheheheeh
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cogzinofa
yeah, and what's your point?
|
You appeared to imply Congress had no authority if electors decide to choose anyone they please. I said Congress had the last word and they do.
|
|
|
Veteran³ Immigrant
|
hey -ss- thought you might enjoy this one
People's Cube Artist Faces 5 Years in Prison for Hanging Up Anti-Terror Posters at GMU
Quote:
The artistic genius behind the highly acclaimed conservative satirical site The People's Cube has been arrested and released on $8,000 bail for putting up pro-Israel posters to combat a pro-Islamist conference at George Mason University. He now faces the prospect of five years in prison for allegedly committing a "class 6 felony."
|
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NightTrain
You appeared to imply Congress had no authority if electors decide to choose anyone they please. I said Congress had the last word and they do.
|
so what you're saying is that you ASS U MEd and were wrong.
apology accepted.
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
That Trump sign video should have been electrified
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cogzinofa
so what you're saying is that you ASS U MEd and were wrong.
apology accepted.
|
|
|
|
Tags
|
#trump2018
,
'tism tantrum
,
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
,
absentthecuck
,
ban dare
,
but her emails
,
cael cuck crying cockgobbler
,
cael cuckersaurus rex
,
cael the triggered
,
captain taxleach
,
ching chong cael melting
,
coombz=actual shit 4 brains
,
crypto-nazi thread
,
cuck bannon
,
dutch embarrassment
,
eric skogland remax
,
havax getting tagged to hr
,
havax= actual shit for brains
,
i'm jimmy pop
,
it was a grift all along
,
jeffrey kaminskas
,
kale is for cucks
,
kiint = michael
,
kiint_the_fat_cunt
,
maga
,
patriots >*
,
seriously ban dare
,
shit flinging trumpet monkeys
,
shitlibs
,
simina mihaela bonner
,
sperg thread
,
trump going to prison
,
trump justice warriors
,
vanster chokes women
,
vanster is still an idiot
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 53 (0 members and 53 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
AGENT: claudebot / Y
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00.
|