Veteran³ Immigrant
|
even mexico makes you get an ID to vote
we aren't even 3rd world in our voting system anymore
but we will be as a nation soon enough
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
lmao, no, cap'n
we won't be "as a nation" soon enough
there will be no such thing as the fictional nation to which we were told we belonged soon enough
and who made sure that it will be the case? flimsy donnie t, that's who
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
Its really a sign of the times that someone would put out information that backs the opposing argument, but still try and spin it by playing to the mathematical illiteracy of the populace. I thought that was reserved for the left and their quintile statistics for wealth and income distribution.
60k records matched across databases containing tens to hundreds of millions of records? A 0.5% data entry error rate would completely wipe that out. So already we're dealing with the equivalent of what is statistical noise.
But let's say the data is perfect, and the matching methodology is 100% accurate. How many unique voters were there between 1996 to 2018? More than 8 million people voted in the midterms in Texas alone, so even if the data was perfect and all 60k of these people voted in the last election, you're still talking about less than 1% of the total vote.
"We found a relatively minuscule number of potential matches, going as far as using only partial SS number matches, across decades of records that demonstrates a completely insignificant impact on election outcomes!" But hey black is white up is down these days.
What is the point of even putting this out there? Is it just blatant contempt for the electorate?
|
|
Last edited by Zlex; 01-27-2019 at 21:46..
|
Veteran++ Contributor
|
MILLIONS NOW LIVING WILL NEVER DIE???!?!
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zlex
Its really a sign of the times that someone would put out information that backs the opposing argument, but still try and spin it by playing to the mathematical illiteracy of the populace. I thought that was reserved for the left and their quintile statistics for wealth and income distribution.
60k records matched across databases containing tens to hundreds of millions of records? A 0.5% data entry error rate would completely wipe that out. So already we're dealing with the equivalent of what is statistical noise.
But let's say the data is perfect, and the matching methodology is 100% accurate. How many unique voters were there between 1996 to 2018? More than 8 million people voted in the midterms in Texas alone, so even if the data was perfect and all 60k of these people voted in the last election, you're still talking about less than 1% of the total vote.
"We found a relatively minuscule number of potential matches, going as far as using only partial SS number matches, across decades of records that demonstrates a completely insignificant impact on election outcomes!" But hey black is white up is down these days.
What is the point of even putting this out there? Is it just blatant contempt for the electorate?
|
I think you missed the entire point of the article...
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
HOW
Quote:
Originally Posted by epidemic
can u not
|
GIVE POSITIVE REP
TO RAMATAKAHN
FOR THIS IMPORTANT FACT
so sorry it doesn't make
you
feelz RIGHT
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Tele
even mexico makes you get an ID to vote
we aren't even 3rd world in our voting system anymore
but we will be as a nation soon enough
|
I mean
COMMON ****ing sense
doesn't feelz good to them
|
|
|
REEEEEEEEEEEXV
|
tfw when u start aligning with an autistic incel jahova
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zlex
Its really a sign of the times that someone would put out information that backs the opposing argument, but still try and spin it by playing to the mathematical illiteracy of the populace. I thought that was reserved for the left and their quintile statistics for wealth and income distribution.
60k records matched across databases containing tens to hundreds of millions of records? A 0.5% data entry error rate would completely wipe that out. So already we're dealing with the equivalent of what is statistical noise.
But let's say the data is perfect, and the matching methodology is 100% accurate. How many unique voters were there between 1996 to 2018? More than 8 million people voted in the midterms in Texas alone, so even if the data was perfect and all 60k of these people voted in the last election, you're still talking about less than 1% of the total vote.
"We found a relatively minuscule number of potential matches, going as far as using only partial SS number matches, across decades of records that demonstrates a completely insignificant impact on election outcomes!" But hey black is white up is down these days.
What is the point of even putting this out there? Is it just blatant contempt for the electorate?
|
There's lies, damned lies and statistics
-some guy
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackpeople
tfw when u start aligning with an autistic incel jahova
|
fuk u, buddy
is MY face, MY smiley when I post regardless of my toe/camber
|
|
|
Veteran³ Immigrant
|
all i see are damned lies
liars
and jew tricks
but with Zlex that is like saying the same thing three times
where 58k known illegal votes, in just one state, is just statistical "noise" now
LMAO
|
|
Last edited by Captain Tele; 02-04-2019 at 19:45..
|
VeteranXX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ztir
There's lies, damned lies and statistics
-some guy
|
i'm p sure that quote is from the dood who invented statistics: cael of tribalwar gaming news
|
|
|
Whiny BitchX Contributor
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zlex
Its really a sign of the times that someone would put out information that backs the opposing argument, but still try and spin it by playing to the mathematical illiteracy of the populace. I thought that was reserved for the left and their quintile statistics for wealth and income distribution.
60k records matched across databases containing tens to hundreds of millions of records? A 0.5% data entry error rate would completely wipe that out. So already we're dealing with the equivalent of what is statistical noise.
But let's say the data is perfect, and the matching methodology is 100% accurate. How many unique voters were there between 1996 to 2018? More than 8 million people voted in the midterms in Texas alone, so even if the data was perfect and all 60k of these people voted in the last election, you're still talking about less than 1% of the total vote.
"We found a relatively minuscule number of potential matches, going as far as using only partial SS number matches, across decades of records that demonstrates a completely insignificant impact on election outcomes!" But hey black is white up is down these days.
What is the point of even putting this out there? Is it just blatant contempt for the electorate?
|
Why is there a single one?
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Tele
all i see are damned lies
liars
and jew tricks
but with Zlex that is like saying the same thing three times
where 58k known illegal votes, in just one state, is just statistical "noise" now
LMAO
|
Well there aren't 58k known illegal votes. That is the point, isn't it? The science of uncertainty analysis is well embraced and understood; it categorizes our total uncertainty into components, such as bias, precision, repeat-ability, and so on. So what is the uncertainty of these results? Did the government go out with a sample of their results and confirm any percentage of them? Did they perform any uncertainty analysis on the accuracy of the data model at all, or did they throw up their hands and say "This sounds like a big number to the mathematically illiterate."
I say this as someone who thinks this issue is flat out nutty; the 'barrier' to obtaining a proper photo ID is truly trivial. When there exists rights based on citizenship, is the requirement to prove citizenship really an unconstitutional 'barrier?' The sanction the left awards is their zealous belief that they are doing this deed on behalf of "the poor and blacks," who they believe require paternalistic protection from ...folks who progressives disagree with politically.
|
|
Last edited by Zlex; 02-05-2019 at 11:28..
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
AGENT: claudebot / Y
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21.
|