nothing new today. I'll try calling her when she is in the office on Monday.
I can only assume she got the same follow up question as the other reporter from scott.
At this point it just looks like him changing his story over and over but I can see how some of the actions of some voters here could be taken out of context. At the same time it shouldn't have warranted a DQ unless I said something. I'm sure something I said could have been taken out of context and look bad though.
This back and forth takes more time than I would like it to.
Both of the reporters I'm talking to are consumer rights reporters and both said legally I have very little I can do but they did say I could probably get an ambulance chaser to take it. Don't really care to deal with that circus