ScooBySnaCk
Tribalwar Overlord
[Mega] MAGA Super Trump Mega Thread
- Thread starter -SS-
- Start date
I would think, at this point
or sometime soon dammit
People will wake up and see we are at war
an information, cyber, and now bio
War With China
Look at the arrests in the Universities
Professors and the amount of student spies we allow in
(all citizens of China are required to do whatever their governent asks them to do...
like spy)
or sometime soon dammit
People will wake up and see we are at war
an information, cyber, and now bio
War With China
Look at the arrests in the Universities
Professors and the amount of student spies we allow in
(all citizens of China are required to do whatever their governent asks them to do...
like spy)
Cool. Here's the literal definition of treason.
the end goal was to overthrow the administration.
Last edited:
Fool
Whiny Bitch
You quoted a dictionary definition, not a criminal definition and certainly not the specific definition as dictated by the constitution.
Here:
Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Here:
Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Fool
Whiny Bitch
There's nothing wrong with the textbook definition of treason, it's just not the correct definition to describe the criminal act. Similar to how the word assault means to make a physical attack on, but the crime of assault is merely the indication that you intend harm and battery is the actual crime of being physically attacked.
It's perfectly acceptable to say that Clinesmith's behavior was treasonous, while stating categorically that he's not guilty of treason. It'd still be a little hyperbolic. It was certainly a corrupt and arguably seditious act.
.......... Nevermind addressing the substance of the article just point and laugh at those who do.
Clown world.
You're more right than you know. This is a major problem in the public discourse and it's rooted in Politically Correct ideology.
Also, people are fucking stupid and no one bothers to study (much less learn from) history anymore.
Because there are different definitions for the word depending on context.
In this context, Fool is correct.
You dont address anything anyways. So whats your point kale.