I am absolutely in favor of a response for the use of chemical weapons.

..not unilaterally if it can be helped, and I think it will be a coalition of countries that end up responding. However if others lack the backbone I think a response must happen.

We do not want to let that genie out of the bottle.
 
I think everybody is in favor of a response.
A response can be anything from a statement of "That wasn't very nice, you guys," to economic sanctions, to a full ICBM nuclear attack of the entire region.

You're going to have to be a lot more specific when you say you're in favor of a "response."
 
if obama were smart he'd be like "okay we wont bomb syria if you give us snowden but if you dont we'll bomb every fucking govt structure theyve got"

but he aint LOL
 
Back
Top