Do Liberals Really Like Charles Darwin?

yep upwards of 50% it looks like

but that is the neat thing about weighted means and averages

the yet to be known 50% doesn't care about the provable 50% we already know and can map/prove

so if you are shooting for an average of 100 IQ (normalized)

it doesn't help if you scored a 50 IQ on your first 50% of possible cognitive questions

it is like telling someone they can't get an A in the class when they got a C on their first 2 out of 3 tests
 
Last edited:
SuperTrap said:
Someone said this the other day...

All dog breeds are equal


Just my contribution
Click to expand...

we are all the same

we are all equal

but some animals in animal farm are more equal than others

DxKKvJeUwAAPKhM.jpg


dang well it must not be genetic it must be environmental

DxKK1BDU8AEb1dB.jpg


well dang it must be some other kind of environment

DxKK8HLUcAA-n8n.jpg


well damn maybe the world is racist

DxKLAk-U0AAqsJM.jpg


reality is racist

cops are racist

iq is racist

iq testing is racist

and prisons are racist
 
Captain Tele said:
yep upwards of 50% it looks like

but that is the neat thing about weighted means and averages

the yet to be known 50% doesn't care about the provable 50% we already know and can map/prove

so if you are shooting for an average of 100 IQ (normalized)

it doesn't help if you scored a 50 IQ on your first 50% of possible cognitive questions

it is like telling someone they can't get an A in the class when they got a C on their first 2 out of 3 tests
Click to expand...
note how none of what you just said has anything to do with race
 
Amadeus said:
IQ distributions are observations of a correlation, not demonstrations of causation

and there are some pretty fucking good non-genetic candidates to explain the causation
Click to expand...

there sure are

but they apparently aren't socioeconomic either

DxMcXpVWwAACu9t.jpg


so maybe you could name the rest of them for me
 
I mean at this point we can map your IQ to your MYDNAANDME23 test results

assume your IQ (to withing 20 pts of accuracy) based off of spitting into a tube

but you can't see a correlation between race and genes or IQ

DxOHIerWwAAeZK6.jpg


just saying
 
THE WE WUZ KANGZ KREW always at the bottom

so these pyramids, towers, must be burial temples for them

I can grasp their confusion.......

and no wonder the Western World is crumbling
 
Captain Tele said:
THE WE WUZ KANGZ KREW always at the bottom

so these pyramids, towers, must be burial temples for them

I can grasp their confusion.......

and no wonder the Western World is crumbling
Click to expand...

gotta check the clear coat for scratches first and vroom down the road before I buy what youre selling here tele
 
Captain Tele said:
dang well it must not be genetic it must be environmental

DxKK1BDU8AEb1dB.jpg
Click to expand...
Did you read the rest of the article?

Here, some choice quotes from the Interpretations section:

the study indicated that cross-racial adoption had a positive effect on black adopted children
Click to expand...

the average IQ of "socially classified" black children was greater than that of the U.S. white mean
Click to expand...

the children with two black parents scored lower than the children with one black and white parent, who in turn scored lower than the adopted children with two white parents
Click to expand...

"The true causes of racial-group differences in IQ, or in any other characteristic, are likely to be too complex to be captured by locating them on a single hereditarianism-environmentalism dimension."
Click to expand...

"The results of the transracial adoption study can be used to support either a genetic difference hypothesis or an environmental difference one (because the children have visible African ancestry)."
Click to expand...

Loehlin (2000) reiterates the confounding problems of the study and notes that both genetic and environmental interpretations are possible.
Click to expand...

Gee, it's almost as if human beings are complex and shit!
 
Amadeus said:
Did you read the rest of the article?

Here, some choice quotes from the Interpretations section:
Click to expand...

same environment different results

with experimental consistency and repeatably and no other possible outcomes

that is what we call something other than environment last i checked

aka that genetic overlap you were looking for (but not really)

again if you want a 1 to 1 mapping I think you know you are going to remain unconvinced......and understandably/intentionally so

if that is your wish I can't talk you out of it
 
Last edited:
Captain Tele said:
all that glistens is my gold rolex and name brand recognition

says the people crying about burger :king: burgers this week
Click to expand...

i dont have time to flip them or pay for them myself

i have a wife to feed

so get the taxpayers to fund it so i can go back to looking at investments

champagne wont chill itself bro
 
Captain Tele said:
same environment different results

with experimental consistency and repeatably and no other possible outcomes

that is what we call something other than environment last i checked

aka that overlap you were looking for (but not really)

again if you want a 1 to 1 mapping I think you know you are going to remain unconvinced......and understandably/intentionally so
Click to expand...
So... who's the one ignoring what actual scientists say when it doesn't agree with his agenda now?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top