The more I see, the more I don't believe an aircraft hit the Pentagon.

JuggerNaught said:
pentcrash.jpg

QUOTE]

Is that some special 9/11 edition of MS Flight Simulator? :eek:
JuggerNaught said:
pentcrash.jpg

QUOTE]

Is that some special 9/11 edition of MS Flight Simulator? :eek:
JuggerNaught said:
pentcrash.jpg

QUOTE]

Is that some special 9/11 edition of MS Flight Simulator? :eek:
JuggerNaught said:
pentcrash.jpg

QUOTE]

Is that some special 9/11 edition of MS Flight Simulator? :eek:
JuggerNaught said:
pentcrash.jpg

QUOTE]

Is that some special 9/11 edition of MS Flight Simulator? :eek:
JuggerNaught said:
pentcrash.jpg

QUOTE]

Is that some special 9/11 edition of MS Flight Simulator? :eek:
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
SegaRob said:
Bounty, could you tell that it was most certainly an aircraft not some other projectile? Was the aircraft a large 757 Boeing airliner or something smaller?
Click to expand...

I worked multiple crash sites during my time in the Coast Guard as a crisis media relations specialist (before the magazine gig), including TWA Flight 800 and Egypt Air 990.

There is absolutely NO DOUBT in my mind that it was a large commercial aircraft.
 
[OPs]Prophecy said:
The whole conspiracy stuff. It entertains me. Plus it is fun to see people get wound up about stuff. I'm bored what can I say.


Anyway, one of the things about conspiracy theorists is they are nothing if not obsessive about their conspiracies.

Despite the name of the website this is from have a look.

It deeply analyzes the minutiae of the whole event. All questions answered, pictures...video...even the math involved. It was a plane.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1
Click to expand...


i love how morons still tried to disagree with him afterwards

and i loved his retort post:

"It's really interesting how people can gloss over an entire thread, without reading the important and fact containing posts, and still manage to offer up their opinions on the subject without doing any research for themselves.

Anyone can have an opinion, it's how educated that opinion is that gives it value. "
 
Uncle Silas said:
Because the 'proof' of someone on a forum called abovetopsecret.com is more reliable than every major news source and the US government.

That's sad.
Click to expand...

Did you even look at it ?
 
well looks like there are wings marks the guy circled in the picture. There are pictures of plane debris on the ground. MAny Many Many witnesses. I mean come on. plsu you say why didn't it burn shit like that chair and stuff. Well when the WTC's were hit why did papers fly out?
 
HCHC said:
But do you seriously believe that cell phones do not work at speeds in excess of 230mph??
Click to expand...

Yeah cause thats faster then the signal can travel!!!! :D


Bounty, do you have any pictures from that day when you watched them remove the wreckage? It would be good evidence for a thread like this. Your account of what happened is what makes me sure that it was a plane. However, I can see that there are things that seem very out of place to an untrained and skeptical eye.
 
How easy it is to tell who has ever taken a course in statics?

hint: people who think it was a missle have never taken one.
 
Bounty said:
I was working at Coast Guard HQ as Asst. Editor at Coast Guard magazine. We were technically (they still are) part of the Imagery branch at HQ. As such, we sometimes had to pull collateral duty as photographers/videographers for D.C./NOVA/MD area events. In this case, we were told to go to the media area and get some photos/video for CG archives.

Being that we were in uniform, we were allowed closer than the civilian media and were able to see more of the rescue/recovery operations than most people. (The fire was completely out by the time we were there the next day.)
Click to expand...

I dont doubt you were there bounty...im just saying that maybe it wasnt a 757.

Look at the pentagon..how wide is that first ring...by the first photo in this thread, if the building is 77 feet tall, i'd say its probably something like 65-70 feet deep.

How do you explain a 144 foot aircraft, hitting with such force that the ENTIRE aircraft, including wings, passengers, seats, luggage, that by everyone else's argument were pulled into the hole, set on fire by the burning jet fuel which burned so long and hot it apparently made the entire aircraft evaporate, yet didnt melt the structure or its internals, hit with such force, yet only made it through the first ring?

And if it didnt happen that way, that means that there is going to be a large portion of this large aircraft lying outside this whole..on fire, burning grass, scarring dirt as it skids to a stop.

I havent done the figures, but could you even stuff that amount of airplane into the square footage of that size of a hole?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top