[So] I just got "terminated"

I think the most logical conclusion (assuming this story isn't 100% bullshit, which is a possibility coming from blitz) is that one of the moms saw him taking her picture, or her child's picture, freaked out and complained. Either that or one of the moms reads tribalwar.
 
Warpath)x( said:
Well, for one thing, he has no idea what the requirements are to make a prima facie case for defamation. Like, at all.

Defamation and other "accounts?" :lol:

For another, this is likely an employment-at-will contract so they can pretty much fire his ass for whatever reason (even though there is cause here) as long as its not based on race or the like.

Oh, and then theres the fact the D.A. is the one that files the criminal complaint. (True, D.A.'s are lawyers, but its not the victim's counsel that decides if charges are pressed which is what seems to be implied).
Click to expand...

I agreed he was a tool I was just wondering what you thought was so funny there is all

also the employment laws that you guys in the states have, suck ass. Up here as long as you are past your probationary period (3 months, unless stated in a contract) then they have to follow alot of steps before they can fire you.
 
WarAngel said:
No he can't. To be a sexual offender you must have committed an offense. He hasn't committed any offense. All you 17 year old lawyers need to shut the fuck up about shit you don't understand.

The LP only mentioned the cops to scare Blitz into ratting out what other things happening in the store that he might have known about.

Edit: I think it is funny you all drool over the Hard Rock pics, but think what Blitz did is somehow different.
Click to expand...


First of all you dont know shit about me and what I understand. I dont hate on Blitz, *but* as an employee posting pictures of unknown women in a sex thread he could be hualed in very easily, I dont know what sex offender laws are in AZ but here in FL they will put you on the list for almost anything.

This also doesnt fall under the catagory of just taking a picture in a public place either. While legally it wouldnt be prosecuted, if any of those women DID find out they could/would sue the shit out of them.
 
As for the case itself. I have no sympathy for the original poster. Taking pictures of women at work and posting it on the net? Telling his manager about it? Come on.

How could such a stellar plan possibly go wrong?!

Lesson learned, be glad it was Toys R' Us and not something in your chosen career
 
Taurus said:
First of all you dont know shit about me and what I understand. I dont hate on Blitz, *but* as an employee posting pictures of unknown women in a sex thread he could be hualed in very easily, I dont know what sex offender laws are in AZ but here in FL they will put you on the list for almost anything.

This also doesnt fall under the catagory of just taking a picture in a public place either. While legally it wouldnt be prosecuted, if any of those women DID find out they could/would sue the shit out of them.
Click to expand...

Stop...just stop it! Please!
 
Taurus said:
First of all you dont know shit about me and what I understand. I dont hate on Blitz, *but* as an employee posting pictures of unknown women in a sex thread he could be hualed in very easily, I dont know what sex offender laws are in AZ but here in FL they will put you on the list for almost anything.

This also doesnt fall under the catagory of just taking a picture in a public place either. While legally it wouldnt be prosecuted, if any of those women DID find out they could/would sue the shit out of them.
Click to expand...

We know Mr "I get paid to take pictures of hot semi-naked women" knows his Photography laws ( I hate you by the way Taurus), but atleast in Ontario he could get away with it. Hell up here woman can go topless in public he could get some better shots :p
 
RE: camera phones and privacy issues

http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,113632,00.asp

Dann, who has since been interviewed by other media, says he did not invade anyone's privacy. If a person acts like a jerk in public, "what's the difference if you have a camera phone or a regular camera to take a picture?"

For now, the law agrees. By going out in public, people surrender some privacy; a cam phone's immediacy alone does not violate privacy laws, says Daniel Solove, a law professor specializing in privacy law. So users are unlikely to be sued for taking shots like Dann's. But there are limits.

Some courts recognize an invasion of privacy if one's reputation is hurt or a photo causes severe embarrassment, says Solove, but such shots must be very offensive and not legitimate news--someone in an adult bookstore, for example.

Other cam phone uses are clearly illegal. In Japan, people have been arrested for taking photos up women's skirts (which is also illegal in parts of the U.S.), and shopkeepers are cracking down on digital shoplifting--photographing pages from books and magazines without paying for them.
Click to expand...
 
NetStalker said:
We know Mr "I get paid to take pictures of hot semi-naked women" knows his Photography laws ( I hate you by the way Taurus), but atleast in Ontario he could get away with it. Hell up here woman can go topless in public he could get some better shots :p
Click to expand...


I <3 NetStalker with all my <3 :sex:
 
It's being re-worked :)

I wasn't really happy with the limitations I've had with my previous software so we're fixing the problem.

Btw get on irc! I want to talk to you.
 
Terra said:
Are you saying I should move to Canada?
Click to expand...
if you would like to. Hell full frontal nudity allowed on regular TV.
if you need a place to sleep you can sleep in my car. but it is a 4 seater so the 4 bucket seats are not the best for sleeping in.
 
NetStalker said:
also the employment laws that you guys in the states have, suck ass. Up here as long as you are past your probationary period (3 months, unless stated in a contract) then they have to follow alot of steps before they can fire you.
Click to expand...

Yeah, god forbid the owner (or owners if its a corporation) of a private business/Corp. decide who they want working for them. Better the government do that.
 
Taurus said:
First of all you dont know shit about me and what I understand. I dont hate on Blitz, *but* as an employee posting pictures of unknown women in a sex thread he could be hualed in very easily, I dont know what sex offender laws are in AZ but here in FL they will put you on the list for almost anything.

This also doesnt fall under the catagory of just taking a picture in a public place either. While legally it wouldnt be prosecuted, if any of those women DID find out they could/would sue the shit out of them.
Click to expand...

Hauled in for what? None of the pictures he took were sexual. Just because YOU wanked off to them, doesn't make them sexual.

Getting sued in America is always possible, but I don't care how many times you get sued in civil court, that WILL NOT PUT YOU ON THE SEXUAL OFFENDERS LIST. You have to be convicted in criminal court of a criminal act. He has not performed any criminal act in either taking or posting these pictures.
 
I think at the very most it would be considered harassment, depending on local laws. In NYC that's a violation, and it has to be witnessed by an officer.
 
WarAngel said:
Hauled in for what? None of the pictures he took were sexual. Just because YOU wanked off to them, doesn't make them sexual.

Getting sued in America is always possible, but I don't care how many times you get sued in civil court, that WILL NOT PUT YOU ON THE SEXUAL OFFENDERS LIST. You have to be convicted in criminal court of a criminal act. He has not performed any criminal act in either taking or posting these pictures.
Click to expand...

First of all it was a good jerk.. I would of done it twice but co-workers kept knocking on the bathroom door.
 
NetStalker said:
if you would like to. Hell full frontal nudity allowed on regular TV.
if you need a place to sleep you can sleep in my car. but it is a 4 seater so the 4 bucket seats are not the best for sleeping in.
Click to expand...
I was thinking.... like... your bed...

no no, you don't need to sleep on the couch.
 
Warpath)x( said:
Yeah, god forbid the owner (or owners if its a corporation) of a private business/Corp. decide who they want working for them. Better the government do that.
Click to expand...

without that law, a business could fire anyone for any reason. Which puts job security right out the window. I should not be fired because someone above decides he just doesn't like me despite that fact I am good at my job. Mind you i come from a Country with a different view on what makes a country strong ( this isn't an Anit-american post, I do not bash americans just because we have different priorities as far as our gov'ts are concerned)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top