Well Data, solid framework can't predict what new technologies etc. come along.
for example the idea of ownership in digital world where everything can be copied without a real cost.
gotta hand it to you though as your constitution is very old and it's held it's relevance till today. Good job your founding fathers.
a constitution is a technology . . .
You read it right?
"Money’s not the problem, Managing Director Sanna Alamaki said in letters to members sent through April 1. It’s “that the benefit applications can’t be processed and, consequently, money can’t be paid out quickly enough,” she said."
... there's relatively easy solution to this. hire more people to go through the applications
Human nature doesn't change at the same rate as technology. I'd argue it rarely changes at all. And since governments are (usually) designed to control the behaviors of people (not technology), any decent founding documents will tend to concentrate on those aspects of human nature and leave out anything regarding technology... because it's irrelevant.
If a certain technology comes about that proves harmful to people in a novel way then governments should work on the underlying behaviors that lead to harm, within the framework of their Constitution, rather than wasting time focused on the superficial technology.
There's always some new "terror" to fret over. But that's not what Constitutions are for.
The stockpile, considered one of Europe’s best and built up over years, includes not only medical supplies, but also oil, grains, agricultural tools and raw materials to make ammunition. Norway, Sweden and Denmark had also amassed large stockpiles of medical and military equipment, fuel and food during the Cold War era. Later, most all but abandoned those stockpiles.