well that's fine. you can assume all you want.
i'd rather know the truth, and hope there could be some consequences. silly, I know, but at least I can hope.
Hope and change huh? You two sound like a couple of Obama voters <3I hope you're somewhat wrong. I don't think the right Right is really using these type of tactics now. In any case root it all out; go after all corruption.
Young Beto O’Rourke casts himself as the ‘anti-Trump’. But his father-in-law, it turns out, is a billionaire property developer with a contentious relationship with non-white residents — not unlike the President.
The New York Times today revealed the highly interesting news that friend-of-the-little-guy Beto married well. Very well. His wife is not only the daughter of William D. Sanders, aka the Warren Buffet of real estate, Cockburn can reveal she is the only daughter. Sanders’s portfolio is valued at about $20 billion.
Nothing wrong with that, of course, but something is amiss when an endless stream of laudatory profiles fails to mention it. ‘Stop the Press Before It Profiles Beto O’Rourke Again,’ came the muffled cry of Politico’s Jack Shafer a couple of weeks ago, from beneath a deluge of glowing cuttings about the Texas congressman.
[.....]
A Yahoo profile of O’Rourke described how he ‘married Amy Sanders, a charter school administrator,’ and served on the City Council ‘championing downtown redevelopment.’ But the reporter didn’t bother to look into who Sanders’s father was.
Neither did this Guardian piece.
Or this Washington Post one.
Nor this one in Vanity Fair.
TIME magazine were agog as the congressman cooed, ‘I just want to be as raw and direct and real as I can — and it seems to be working.’
And GQ were content to focus on other members of his family. ‘O’Rourke ascended the stage with his daughter, Molly, riding piggyback. She and her mom, Amy, also dressed in a Diablito uniform, stood by O’Rourke as he presented Daniel with a cake and led a chorus of “Happy Birthday.”’ Cute stuff — but we’d rather hear about their property magnate grandfather if it’s all the same.
[.....]
Hell, I dont know? I only posted that because if he has an (R) next to his name, the media would have run him through the mud for being married to a potential billionaire heiress. For all we know, Sanders will be giving all his money away to think tank trusts and leave her high and dry.
What an intelligent response. So what you're saying is that I shouldn't bother seriously engaging with you. Got it.
C-SPAN Poll: How Americans Feel About Birthright Citizenship Might Shock You
Earlier this week, President Donald Trump drew inflammatory headlines from the mainstream media over his declaration to end birthright citizenship — the idea that any child born on American soil is automatically a United States citizen, even if the mother is an illegal immigrant – possibly by bypassing Congress and signing an executive order.
[.....]
While it's clear the media are no fans of ending birthright citizenship, as screeching headlines from leftist journalists suddenly taken with the Constitution suggest, how do the American people feel about it?
While recently polling on the issue is sparse, C-SPAN's Washington Journal, which is not exactly a right-wing outlet, put out a Twitter poll on Wednesday.
"Should U.S. End Birthright Citizenship?" asked the straightforward poll. Over 9,000 Twitter users responded.
The final results showed resounding agreement with the president that birthright citizenship should end. A total of 6,683 participants, or 72%, answered "yes"; and 2,6000 participants, or 28%, responded "no."
POTUS claims human trafficking is the worst it's ever been in 500 years
https://www.dailywire.com/news/37881/c-span-poll-how-americans-feel-about-birthright-amanda-prestigiacomo
arguing with a leftist is like playing chess with a chicken. They end up knocking over the pieces, shitting on the board and strutting off like they won
arguing with a leftist is like playing chess with a chicken. They end up knocking over the pieces, shitting on the board and strutting off like they won