Rabid Poop said:says the man who hasn't even been registered a month.
Sir Lucius said:He's got a valid point if not a little exagerated (I wouldn't say every other week the issue comes up, but people are always more than willing to talk about it). At this stage no mannor of petitioning will force the inclusion of a hook, and if it's already in development we're just wasting our breath.
Well rabid poop, outside of Tribalwar dot com general discussion most people dont care about how long you have been registered for said forum.Rabid Poop said:I know, I just find it kind of ironic that Rigel is ordering ixiterra what to do when he'd get flamed to a pulp in general discussion.
Please keep "General" comments in the "General" section.Falhawk said:you won't be missed.
WeNdeL said:i thought the grappling hook was a completely stupid idea...
How much fun would it be as a capper getting yanked by 2-3 LD as you're about to grab?
It's about as fun as getting MD'd by 2-3 LD. YAY!
Kindly replace fun with gay and there you have it!
Originally Posted by Zoolooman
But Lucius, part of Tribes's greatest balancing features is the predictability of inertia. When you move fast, you lose the capability to maneuver out of the way. The grappling hook as a redirecting force counters one of the central mechanics of the jetpack movements: predictability.
Rabid Poop said:I know, I just find it kind of ironic that Rigel is ordering ixiterra what to do when he'd get flamed to a pulp in general discussion.
Thrax Panda said:Please keep "General" comments in the "General" section.
x66 said:Jesus, you vets are amazing.
Please explain to me what is so special about this little tag next to your names. Does it do something I haven't yet realized? Oh, I get it, it allows you to respond to a very noteworthy post made by a 'member', that you wouldn't normally be able to respond to.
Good for you, you've wasted the last 2 or 3 years of your life addicted to a gaming forum that speaks very little about games or even Tribes for that matter. Yay!
At what point did I flame him for being a member? Rabid was the one who pounced on that subject, and he probably wouldn't have either if Rigel hadn't started with the whole "for a vet" thing. Quite a bit less "fucking member" type stuff goes on in TT, and I respect the fact that the admins want it that way.x66 said:Assuming what? Brought what up? If you're going to post a retort-thread, at least verify what you're talking about.
What makes me laugh is you honestly think this is only pertinent to this thread alone. You've been around, you know this happens on a consistent basis to almost every 'member' with a concious to reply to assholes such as yourself.
Yeah, the reason is your post makes no fucking sense. If you want to bitch out vets for bitching out members just because they're members, yeah make your peace in a thread where that actually occurs, or make a topic in GD. Otherwise, it's completely off-topic and unfounded in this thread.x66 said:So you're suggesting I go start a new thread? Or should I just post a generalized statement in a thread that would seem well fitting for it?
Okay, where's the part about me saying you flamed him? I'm calling you an asshole. If you read the comment and assume otherwise, maybe there's a reason for that?