Why should I support repealing net neutrality?

Amadeus said:
wow i had no idea

so science

very learn
Click to expand...

Not(C) => Not(A and B)
Not(A and B) is equivalent to Not(A) or Not(B), so Not(C) => Not(A) or Not(B)

xx5HLi2.gif
xx5HLi2.gif
xx5HLi2.gif
xx5HLi2.gif


u thunk u thunk
 
why didn't the FCC do their fucking job Amadeus?

answer that simple question for me

then can we can work on why the government can never do their fucking job

just take our money while demanding more responsibility and control while selling us further down the river
 
NOT (i) = NOT (netflix) ** NOT (google)

as u can see as netflix and google go up the internet goes down that's the transitive property of small govt

riddle me this commie boys

why isn't the fcc doing their job now?? why is the fcc letting billionaire netflix get away with taking up all the internets?
 
havax said:
You and I both know that that's not gonna happen. And whether you want to believe it or not, Google IS a monopoly.

Great power requires great responsibility. Not forcing your narrative would be a good start. Or you could just rely on government to save us. Lol
Click to expand...

I think maybe step 1 is learning what a monopoly is and then forming an opinion
 
Ztir said:
I think maybe step 1 is learning what a monopoly is and then forming an opinion
Click to expand...

do we trust the EU and UN who already ruled on this?

or do we pretend we don't give a fuck about what they have to say because of political expediency

this is like sexual assault and i guess it depends on what day it is
 
im not sure we're using the correct definition of monopoly here

most of north americas telecom is an oligopoly if anything

and regardless of EU or UN rulings, or having a dominant market position, you can still use the internet without having to use chrome/google/youtube

:shrug:

semantics, i know
 
and groove i totally agree that sat sux

but my options growing up in rural bumfuck always sucked

local dsl is still so bad that u couldn't even watch netflix if u wanted to

and cable was like 60 bucks a month.....and had to be bundled with basic tv for over 100 a month

that makes sat internet sound great again compared to those other terribad options

u will often see honkies using their barely 1g cell phone data and it works faster than their isp way out in the boonies

these options are going to be last option if charter and comcast keep fucking around

same way direct tv and dish killed local cable companies.....the wireless options are going to have to save the day again

https://broadbandnow.com/Fixed-Wireless

help us ob1 we need u
 
Last edited:
monopoly: i live in rural 'x', i have 1 internet provider

oligopoly: my country only has 3 isps and they collude

google: a freely available brand of products to which there are viable alternatives i can choose to use if i disagree with their business practices or whatever
 
Ztir said:
monopoly: i live in rural 'x', i have 1 internet provider

oligopoly: my country only has 3 isps and they collude

google: a freely available brand of products to which there are viable alternatives i can choose to use if i disagree with their business practices or whatever
Click to expand...

guy who sure loves government

last person to understand what they are doing or fighting for

Google hit with record £2.1bn EU fine for abusing internet search monopoly

Google slapped with antitrust lawsuit

Google charged by EU with antitrust in Android lawsuit - Apr. 20, 2016

Google Fined Record $2.7 Billion in E.U. Antitrust Ruling - The New York Times

maybe u should read up on what legal definition of monopoly is

or how that has been historically enforced u silly supplicant

being the last to know what your loved ones is doing is kind of silly
 
Captain Tele said:
guy who sure loves government

last person to understand what they are doing or fighting for

Google hit with record £2.1bn EU fine for abusing internet search monopoly

Google slapped with antitrust lawsuit

Google charged by EU with antitrust in Android lawsuit - Apr. 20, 2016

Google Fined Record $2.7 Billion in E.U. Antitrust Ruling - The New York Times

maybe u should read up on what legal definition of monopoly is

or how that has been historically enforced u silly supplicant

being the last to know what your loved ones is doing is kind of silly
Click to expand...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/06/27/eu-hits-google-record-21bn-fine-abusing-internet-search-monopoly/ said:
Margrethe Vestager, the European competition commissioner, said Google "abused its market dominance as a search engine by promoting its own comparison shopping service in its search results, and demoting those of competitors."
Click to expand...

i personally didn't read the entire ruling so i may be wrong but they don't appear to be saying google is a monopoly - they said they abused their market dominance

not really the same thing

reporters seem to be adding the 'monopoly' part, maybe as an oversimplification or to make people angry or whatever other motivation they may have
 
phaytal said:
Antitrust apparently means the same as monopoly in Teleworld.
Click to expand...

u should come visit

i will save u a place

everyone else on Earth u know is hanging out there (whether they know it or not)

United States antitrust law - Wikipedia

Antitrust law legal definition of antitrust law

at&t and standard oil would love to know that they were so wrongly persecuted and subsequently split apart

that having another options, whom they often interfered or colluded with, still wasn't your textbook definition

no wonder you guys can cry about fcc ruling AND time warner merger being purely political with same wasted breath

:rofl:

u dipshits have no idea what you are fighting for besides being a mindless consumerist fleeced after every fight.....far worse off after every swing and a miss
 
Last edited:
Groove said:
i personally didn't read the entire ruling so i may be wrong but they don't appear to be saying google is a monopoly - they said they abused their market dominance

not really the same thing

reporters seem to be adding the 'monopoly' part, maybe as an oversimplification or to make people angry or whatever other motivation they may have
Click to expand...

i honestly don't even know if i agree with the ruling or the lawsuit

i am just pointing out that the ruling has already been made by some

is written in stone in Europe and by EU

Why was Microsoft subject to antitrust charges in 1998?

same went for Microsoft with their browser, internet explorer, when there were viable alternatives to that to ......

i mean i know a case can be made that there are about as many independent ISP providers in the USA than there are search engines that in no way use, are optimized by, or reference GOOGLE search indexing (i mean ffs look at our own search on this site)

in fact i would argue there are far more ISP providers than search engines who completely fit that criteria (considering their market share)..........sooooooooooo

what all this crying about? How we have so many google apologists while they cry about comcast and charter baffles me right now

that is all i do know.......and it is funny to watch

haven't been this amused since people started sucking off jobs to get back at bill gates
 
Last edited:
Net neutrality was intended to shut down intimidate and ultimately imprison Christians, and it will be used instead to clean out the likes of twitter facebook and youtube from being able to ban or otherwise silence opposition to their leftist agenda.

And if that doesn't work these big businesses will be losing in court anyways if conservatives have the balls to take them there.
 
Amadeus said:
So that ISPs can take more of everyone's money?

That's literally the only reason it's being pushed.
Click to expand...

Except that it also allows ISPs to better manage their networks and hence keep costs down, meaning they don't have to increase their prices to stay in business.

I'm not saying they wouldn't price gouge... but they could do that already if they wanted to. The whole "pay extra for faster content from X and Y" angle is a nice scare tactic, but it'd be a whole lot simpler for them to just say "fuck it, everything now costs an extra ten bucks". Consumers are only really willing to pay up to a point.. go too high and they'll find alternatives.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top