That's the popular consumer opinion.
But when have Insurance companies ever based a premium on user-specific data? (outside of claims/tickets)
Under 25 years old? Higher premium
Male? Higher premium.
Riding a motorcycle? Higher premium - oh you have 30 years riding experience with no accidents? Well it's still a motorcycle. (plus you're older and now your body sucks at healing).
Moved to a new area? Well the zip/postal code is an area with a higher frequency of accidents so your premium just went up.
As someone who once worked in the industry; you're just giving money back to the insurance company by not taking their usage-based insurance (UBI) device. If ANY premium penalties were to ever come from such a device it would be yet another broad statistic applied to entire geographic areas and not onto the individual.
The actual payoff to the insurance company for having you install the device is that it makes drivers more conscientious of their driving habits and thus less prone to getting into an accident (which means fewer claims they have to pay out on). The device typically measures rapid acceleration and hard braking - These two things are specifically correlated to one car driving into another. If a driver is avoiding hard-brakes then they have to leave more room between them and the car in front - so when it does come time to rapidly brake, you have more room to avoid a collision.
The heaviest bias I ever noticed from these devices were from city drivers and more specifically highway drivers. Hard breaking is just unavoidable. But they still earned the minimum discount upon renewal which I think was 5% and after the first year the device was mailed back and no longer used.
But when have Insurance companies ever based a premium on user-specific data? (outside of claims/tickets)
Under 25 years old? Higher premium
Male? Higher premium.
Riding a motorcycle? Higher premium - oh you have 30 years riding experience with no accidents? Well it's still a motorcycle. (plus you're older and now your body sucks at healing).
Moved to a new area? Well the zip/postal code is an area with a higher frequency of accidents so your premium just went up.
As someone who once worked in the industry; you're just giving money back to the insurance company by not taking their usage-based insurance (UBI) device. If ANY premium penalties were to ever come from such a device it would be yet another broad statistic applied to entire geographic areas and not onto the individual.
The actual payoff to the insurance company for having you install the device is that it makes drivers more conscientious of their driving habits and thus less prone to getting into an accident (which means fewer claims they have to pay out on). The device typically measures rapid acceleration and hard braking - These two things are specifically correlated to one car driving into another. If a driver is avoiding hard-brakes then they have to leave more room between them and the car in front - so when it does come time to rapidly brake, you have more room to avoid a collision.
The heaviest bias I ever noticed from these devices were from city drivers and more specifically highway drivers. Hard breaking is just unavoidable. But they still earned the minimum discount upon renewal which I think was 5% and after the first year the device was mailed back and no longer used.