i mean i really don't want to be racist
It's pretty obvious they are implementing shame (something they dont have, just look at posters dealydump, failtowel, and others) to implement their marxist agenda:
Communists’ Ten-Point Plan for Erasing Families
Some of these ideas were already emerging in “The Communist Manifesto.” There, Marx and Engels included a shocking but telling 10-point plan for their new ideal of humanity. Here it is, in direct quotation:
- Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
- A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
- Abolition of all right of inheritance.
- Confiscation of all property of emigrants and rebels.
- Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
- Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.
- Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
- Equal obligation of all to work….
- … gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equitable distribution of the population over the country.
- Free education for all children in public schools…
How could a classless society guarantee equality of income when some persons at birth were unjustly handed more income from their parents than others?
It's no surprise that this bullshit ideology was dreamed up by a fucking parasite (Marx) and ironically, funded by Engel's inheritance / investments.
Note: Engels did not believe in marriage. He lived with Mary Burns then shacked up with her sister Lizzy after Mary died.
The Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/ch02d.htmFull freedom of marriage can therefore only be generally established when the abolition of capitalist production and of the property relations created by it has removed all the accompanying economic considerations which still exert such a powerful influence on the choice of a marriage partner. For then there is no other motive left except mutual inclination.
What we can now conjecture about the way in which sexual relations will be ordered after the impending overthrow of capitalist production is mainly of a negative character, limited for the most part to what will disappear. But what will there be new? That will be answered when a new generation has grown up: a generation of men who never in their lives have known what it is to buy a woman’s surrender with money or any other social instrument of power; a generation of women who have never known what it is to give themselves to a man from any other considerations than real love, or to refuse to give themselves to their lover from fear of the economic consequences.
Translation: Program the next generation to think correctly and the old ways will be forgotten.
Aka: Today's soy bois.