[Mega] MAGA Super Trump Mega Thread

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Vampire scare in Malawi prompts UN to move staff after mob violence, report says | Fox News

A vampire scare in Malawi is reportedly responsible for mob violence that's resulted in the deaths of at least five people -- and prompted the United Nations to pull its staff in the area.

The eruption of vampire-driven vigilante violence in the African nation came after rumors surfaced in September that real-life bloodsuckers were creating havoc. Those reports prompted the formation of lynch mobs who've accused people of vampirism, according to a U.N. Department on Safety and Security report obtained by Reuters.

“These districts have severely been affected by the ongoing stories of blood sucking and possible existence of vampires,” the agency said regarding districts in the southern part of the country.
Click to expand...
 
phaytal said:
Skirting the issue by saying he won't play games is not a denial. Now if he we're to say 'I did not call Trump a moron', that would be a denial.

He said what we all know to be true. Trump is a moron. And for Trump to 'challenge' Tillerson to an IQ test, is all but an admission that he knows it happened himself.

:lol:
Click to expand...


Hey asshole, can you read?

"The secretary is a man who frequently talks about integrity," she said. "Integrity is something that is important to him. I take him at his word. And when he tells me 'Heather, I did not use that,' I believe him."
 
Last edited:
That is him denying it. Believe him or not is up to you but to say he confirmed something by not denying it is asinine but especially so with the kind of statement he made in regards to it.
 
SuperTrap said:
Hey asshole, can you read?

"The secretary is a man who frequently talks about integrity," she said. "Integrity is something that is important to him. I take him at his word. And when he tells me 'Heather, I did not use that,' I believe him."
Click to expand...

:lol:

A statement from the White House is not the same as a statement from the man himself. Of course the White House is going to deny it. A top staff member just called the leader of the free world a moron.

Why is this difficult.
 
phaytal said:
:lol:

A statement from the White House is not the same as a statement from the man himself. Of course the White House is going to deny it. A top staff member just called the leader of the free world a moron.

Why is this difficult.
Click to expand...

really though? who gives a shit about this? lol

the left is so petty and divisive.
 
phaytal said:
:lol:

A statement from the press is not the same as a statement from the man himself. Of course the press is going to confirm it. A top media member just said Tillerson said he wasn't going to play that game when asked if he called the leader of the free world a moron. Report confirmed. He did call him a moron.

Why is this difficult.
Click to expand...
 
Well duh. Impeachment next week.

How is that russia thing going anyway?

Well so far facebook is guilty.. google is guilty
 
MC Hamster said:
(err.. re Val's ramblings...)

No, it comes down to what the aims of that government are. "Big" or "Small" is entirely irrelevant to that, no matter how loudly you bleat it out.

If you're talking about left v right in a modern society, you need to break it down into social and economic aspects. Socially, the left is progressive and ultimately quite liberal(/libertarian!) in advocating as much personal freedom as possible while not impacting others (hence drug laws, abortion, etc),
Click to expand...
No! No they are not. They are not liberal and nowhere close to being a libertarian, as the progressives are some of the most regressive and authoritarian people on the face of the planet, except for maybe Muslims. I am a liberal in the original sense of the word: i want the people to have the ultimate liberty in every aspect of their lives, as long as it does not infringe on other peoples rights to life, liberty and property. Progressives are the furthest thing from being a liberal.

You said 2 things the left wants freedom for: abortions and drugs and even with drugs, they really only advocate for weed to be free. And that... well, that is the extent of the lefts liberal advocacy.

What is a progressive? An elitist, authoritarian asshole who is willing to give up their liberties to the government, in an attempt to FORCE the rest of society to behave, act, and think as the progressive wants them to.

MC Hamster said:
while the right is driven more by conservative/religious values. There are obviously blurrings in there where issues overlap and cross over for various factors, but broadly speaking that's the gist of it.
Click to expand...
And how does the 'right' accomplish these goals against the other citizens? Through the use of an overbearing and authoritarian government. The modern day left and right both use the government to achieve these goals, they just want to impose different moral aspects onto the public through of less liberty for the people and more power for a central government.
MC Hamster said:
Economically, leftists seek an 'equality', aiming to support the disadvantaged at the expense of the elite, while the right does basically the opposite, redistributing towards the top.
Click to expand...
Again... how are these goals accomplished? Through the implementation of an overbearing leftist authoritarian government that believes they have the legal right to force the citizens to do x, y & z.
MC Hamster said:
No, it's not about more or less government. That's a side-effect.
Click to expand...
No its not. It has everything to do with more or less government. More government, the people sat to the RIGHT of the king; the people whom wanted less government, sat to the LEFT of the king.

J.P. Morgan and the progressives flipped the ideologies to trick the American people into voting for more progressives so they can create the defense industry and get America into European wars and enslave the people through government debt.
MC Hamster said:
Right-wing politics supports the wealthy & powerful. Many of those wealthy and powerful are hampered in their pursuit of further wealth and power by pesky government regulations designed to stop them raping the rest of the populace, so they are naturally opposed to that. On the left, it is that government influence which protects the vulnerable from those that would exploit them.
Click to expand...
This right here ^, is standard Marxist political talking points. You literally divided the citizenry into the proletariat and the bourgeoisie and then are trying to say that depending on which group the GOVERNMENT is using force against, to benefit and pander to the other side, somehow dictates whether it is left or right. Again, you are totally overlooking the common thing in every attempt to explain yourself: The use of the Government to accomplish those goals.
MC Hamster said:
However - the right can also benefit from 'big government'.. The likes of Lockheed, Boeing, GD.. they make vast amounts of money thanks to what can only be described as right-wing politics, and they are absolutely reliant on big government... kinda like Porsche, Krupp, Henschel and others were in Nazi Germany, and there you have your tie-in to left v right. The rise of the elite in the communist USSR was not a systemic aim of the politics, but a corruption of it. Conversely, Nazi Germany was openly and proudly focused on further elevating and rewarding the elite in the belief that that would flow on to the rest of the people.
Click to expand...
Nazi Germany and Soviet Socialist Republic - 2 extreme leftist ideologies (in modern political vernacular) differing only in the economic freedoms granted to the people through their overbearing, authoritarian government.
 
Havax u should move out of San Antonio maybe I'd be less rage

Imagine growing up in corpus Christi then moving to even shittier San Antonio

No wonder he's always raging and triggered redneck
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top