REEEEEEEEEEEXV
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cael
is this the whine of the week? i thought we were still doing nfl
|
this is what it's been reduced to
SAD!
|
|
|
REEEEEEEEEEEXV
|
girls joining boys scouts
Merry Christmas on my coffee cup
kneeling
lol
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
cherry mristmas
|
|
|
Veteran³ Immigrant
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coombz
gosh before you know it they'll start letting negros join!
|
they will be more tolerant and diverse than coombz neighborhood and home rentals
|
|
|
Veteran³ Immigrant
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by [MD5]Hash
I thought that's what the Girl Scouts were for?
I'm not sure I understand the point of this.
|
i think u get the point just fine then
one giant freakshow and clown town
where sex doesn't matter and we can piss and **** wherever we want to
no societal norms or structure
|
|
|
VeteranX
|
Boy Scouts just want to take over that cookie market, capitalism man!
|
|
|
Veteran³ Immigrant
|
very possible and plausible
late stage capitalism man
it gonna get good
|
|
|
Whiny BitchX Contributor
|
I don't see the issue with letting girls pursue Eagle Scout in a new program. There's probably less than a handful in the whole nation interested in that anyway. I do think it's unlikely you see anyone clamoring that boys should be allowed to join the Girl Scouts though.
|
|
|
Veteran³ Immigrant
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fool
I do think it's unlikely you see anyone clamoring that boys should be allowed to join the Girl Scouts though.
|
there is the rub in my head
World champion Caster Semenya 'is a hermaphrodite with no womb or ovaries' - Australian newspaper's shock claims over gender-row runner | Daily Mail Online
it feels like we have had these discussion before regarding other events
how if you just let men into female sports they would dominate and even Bruce Jenner would still be winning gold medals today
i mean we have male and female distinct groups for a reason
then we try to pretend there is no reason
all sexes are equal
then we realize there were reasons
all sexes are not equal
then we go back to fighting over the victimization that prompted male and female sports teams and groups to begin with
rinse and repeat forever apparently
|
|
|
Veteran³ Immigrant
|
this one has nothing to do with merit based competition as much as it has to do with why we have boys and girls dorms. why that is a thing......a thing we still do
it is almost like we could learn something from that too
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cael
is this the whine of the week? i thought we were still doing nfl
|
We already won that fight, try to keep up ****-face.
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
How can they keep up when their entire world is on fire?
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
Why not just have "Scouts".
I thought being a Scout was a measure of ones own potential against yourself, not against or compared to others. So, why can't a girl strive to be an Eagle Scout under the same requirements expected of a boy? having a female "boy" scout is awkward, hence just dropping the distinction and merely having scouts.
Segregating the girls and boys apart from each other for specific conditions like into troops and dorms seems logical... but why in their expectations and goals? Why distinctions like Girl Guides bake cookies and Boy Scouts tie knots? Why do we make such gender specific associations? Would it be strange to think of a boy baking cookies or a girl who can tie a knot?
Boys and Girls are not homogeneous in every aspect. It's not a coincidence that we have two genders (and only two). Otherwise we'd just be "humans". We do differ in our development and perspectives. Our distinctive differences have not evolved to be entirely superfluous and superficial. Perhaps we are guilty of shortchanging the capacity of a genders potential by putting them into a box that under values them.
Like the idea that woman are incapable of driving a car. Not just the mental capacity to understand how to drive a car, but the physical capacity to operate the controls of the machinery. Obviously the mental capacity is irrelevant, woman clearly have the cognitive capacity to understand how to drive, but there was a time when society actually presumed that woman would be intimidated by the task or it just wasn't something a woman did. It was un-lady-like. Maybe in the earliest of days there was a case for the physicality of driving a car. There wasn't power steering, power brakes, electric start or other mechanical assists to reduce the physical demand of properly operating the car. However, that isn't true any more and today it's ridiculous to think that driving is beyond the capacity of a woman.
The Boy Scouts are an organization that is 105 years old, the image of what a "boy scout" should be was was established at a time when society had similar preconceptions of what defines the image of a boy and a girl in their development and demeanor, much like their capacity to drive a car or do other things.
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
am i the only one who thinks eagle scouts are all dorks??
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
@Hellsfury
ummm, have you seen women try to get in and out of parking spaces?
|
|
|
VeteranXX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeLiaL
@Hellsfury
ummm, have you seen women try to get in and out of parking spaces?
|
I knew this joke was inevitable...
|
|
|
Whiny BitchX Contributor
|
joke?
|
|
|
VeteranXX Contributor
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellsfury
Why not just have "Scouts".
I thought being a Scout was a measure of ones own potential against yourself, not against or compared to others. So, why can't a girl strive to be an Eagle Scout under the same requirements expected of a boy? having a female "boy" scout is awkward, hence just dropping the distinction and merely having scouts.
Segregating the girls and boys apart from each other for specific conditions like into troops and dorms seems logical... but why in their expectations and goals? Why distinctions like Girl Guides bake cookies and Boy Scouts tie knots? Why do we make such gender specific associations? Would it be strange to think of a boy baking cookies or a girl who can tie a knot?
Boys and Girls are not homogeneous in every aspect. It's not a coincidence that we have two genders (and only two). Otherwise we'd just be "humans". We do differ in our development and perspectives. Our distinctive differences have not evolved to be entirely superfluous and superficial. Perhaps we are guilty of shortchanging the capacity of a genders potential by putting them into a box that under values them.
Like the idea that woman are incapable of driving a car. Not just the mental capacity to understand how to drive a car, but the physical capacity to operate the controls of the machinery. Obviously the mental capacity is irrelevant, woman clearly have the cognitive capacity to understand how to drive, but there was a time when society actually presumed that woman would be intimidated by the task or it just wasn't something a woman did. It was un-lady-like. Maybe in the earliest of days there was a case for the physicality of driving a car. There wasn't power steering, power brakes, electric start or other mechanical assists to reduce the physical demand of properly operating the car. However, that isn't true any more and today it's ridiculous to think that driving is beyond the capacity of a woman.
The Boy Scouts are an organization that is 105 years old, the image of what a "boy scout" should be was was established at a time when society had similar preconceptions of what defines the image of a boy and a girl in their development and demeanor, much like their capacity to drive a car or do other things.
|
What a cuck... I'm not sure who here can even rival this retard.
You think gender is just some social construct and that women and men don't have predilections for certain things, let alone strengths (even though they are evident in ****ing newborns).
I mean, you just used ****ing car driving as an example. Do you know how stupid and oblivious you are? Any clue?
Edit: Not that I give a **** what Boy Scouts do, but it is most definitely pandering to females as the known weaker sex, but parading it as they are equals.
|
|
|
VeteranXV
|
so whats wrong with girl scouts
|
|
|
Veteran³ Immigrant
|
they are admitting that the female part of it has made it inferior
the sexes are not equal......they are complimentary
and have always been designed since our origins to be that way
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
AGENT: claudebot / Y
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35.
|