https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/17/style/ivanka-trump-jared-kushner.html
Lock them both up i say and jared too
Killary jared & ivanka can all share a cell
Put podesta and soros in one too
I honestly have no idea what Ivanka's title is (and neither does anyone here, as they keep referring to here as 'Trump's daughter'," but I don't give a shit if she used gmail for official business.
O someone affiliated w/ the political party I cheer for did something bad and in the same vein of a thing we crucified someone on the other sports team for
Do I condemn it like an unbiased person
Do I use mental gymnastics to explain why it's not hypocritical for me to not condemn it
I am so conflicted :[
i agree with everything you just said.
if the law was broken, lock them up.
Everyone here condemns the use of a private email address. It's poor optics. It's not, however, equivalent or in the same vein. At all. Not unless you remove all of the context of the original argument for the sake of convenience. Hillary used a private email server feloniously. Ivanka used a private email server. Do you spot the difference?
If one person drives a car with a broken tail light, and another drives a car with a broken tail light while muling drugs and running from the cops, do you say "Well they're basically the same thing, they both drove with a broken tail light."?
Yael is an Israeli spy. Her wiki page says, "Trump says she is an advocate for women and Israel".[108]
She shouldn't be anywhere near national policy. But, then again, I dont Jews should be anywhere near our government. If she broke the law, throw her ass in prison.
More fallout.. Judge said you can't do shit about Acosta because you do not have established rules. Now they do and the fake news is going to pay
Chuck Todd rips 'absurd' White House rules: No serious journalist will follow these | TheHill
YEAH LETS FOLLOW THE COURT RULING
NOOOO NOT THAT PART OF THE RULING
the fallacy of loose interpretations
There are few less sympathetic characters in America than a member of Congress. The caricature of the rich, or about-to-cash-out, sleazy elected official out to further enrich themselves and wine and dine among the cocktail party set in Georgetown is well established. And indeed, the average member of Congress has a net worth of more than $1 million, according to the latest data available.
One problem Congress faces solving this problem is that it is politically impossible to vote yourself a new benefit or luxury. Most congressional pay raises take effect in the next Congress to avoid this appearance of conflict. Members of Congress earn a salary of $174,000, which is well above the national median income, but they haven’t had a pay raise since 2009.
Still, who really feels sorry for Congress? Many are indeed independently wealthy, and again, $174,000 a year is not exactly the wages of poverty. Shouldn’t that be enough?
Set aside the political optics for a second, though, and the idea of subsidized housing for members of Congress makes a ton of sense.
Washington is also very expensive.