So I struck a nerve bringing up the fact you live with your mom in law?
Bloomberg isn't part of "call out culture" like the heavy liberal Bernie supporters probably would be (generalizing but seems like a safe assumption). If you attack Bloomberg you're only attacking him vs attacking Bernie and all his followers.It's pretty funny that they're willing to savage the guy with $65B at his disposal, to his face, but they're so terrified of Bernie Bros that they'll tiptoe around things and let the media do hit pieces instead. I mean Warren somehow looked competent even without having a voice.
His programs only worked in NYC and the results were twisted. Would not work for the entire country. Everything he did has been fact checked and there's footnotes explaining each accomplishment.Been waiting for this to hit youtube
Bloomberg is a douchebag but that joke went right over their heads
The thing that got me was him trying to explain why the housing bubble burst. It was because the left forced the banks to give out loans to minorities (blacks) who couldn't afford to pay them back. The lending requirements were ignored. The result, a massive bubble leading to a recession.
"We are now in a full-blown national security crisis," Brennan said. "By trying to prevent the flow of intelligence to Congress, Trump is abetting a Russian covert operation to keep him in office for Moscow's interests, not America's." Brennan served as CIA director from 2013 to 2017.
the "left" being a republican controlled house and senate
Bullshit. That crap actually started with carter. While none of the politicians on both sides of the idle tried to stop it, blaming it on the republicans because the collapse happened while bush was in office is bullshit. It was going to happen no matter what.
Sen. Phil Gramm (R, Texas), Rep. Jim Leach (R, Iowa), and Rep. Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. (R, Virginia), the co-sponsors of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act.
During debate in the House of Representatives, Rep. John Dingell (Democrat of Michigan) argued that the bill would result in banks becoming "too big to fail." Dingell further argued that this would necessarily result in a bailout by the Federal Government.
The House passed its version of the Financial Services Act of 1999 on July 1, 1999, by a bipartisan vote of 343–86 (Republicans 205–16; Democrats 138–69; Independent 0–1), two months after the Senate had already passed its version of the bill on May 6 by a much narrower 54–44 vote along basically partisan lines (53 Republicans and 1 Democrat in favor; 44 Democrats opposed).
The videos showing the black congressmen saying everything was great and yelling at a republican congressman have been removed from YouTube, I can't find them. Here's one video. Thanks Barney.the "left" being a republican controlled house and senate
This is what NGFM and I are referring to:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm–Leach–Bliley_Act
The fuck that it was going to happen "no matter what."
The FDIC related provisions of the new Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, along with the addition of sub-section § 2903(c) directly to Title 12, insured any bank holding institution wishing to be re-designated as a financial holding institution by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System would also have to follow Community Reinvestment Act compliance guidelines before any merger or expansion could take effect.
And you even quote that the bill you refer to passed by a wide bipartisan vote. So yeah.
It did not. The subprime mortgage crisis would have had nowhere near the reach it did without the consolidation of toxic securities into bigger and bigger balls of shit, expressly provided by the GLBA.
From your link:
Want to be too big to fail? First you have to comply with the CRA, lols.
I said it was a republican controlled house and senate. And it passed one bipartisan and one totally partisan. So, yeah, no.
the consolidation of toxic securities into bigger and bigger balls of shit, expressly provided by the GLBA.
The fuck that it was going to happen "no matter what."