J. Daspin III of Flame4Cash fame has officially screwed the pooch by nSpectre - Page 11 - TribalWar Forums
Click Here to find great hosting deals from Branzone.com


Go Back   TribalWar Forums > TribalWar History > TWHOF
Reload this Page J. Daspin III of Flame4Cash fame has officially screwed the pooch
Page 11 of 27
El Mariachi
VeteranXV
Old
201 - 09-04-2003, 23:14
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaD_ReBeL
naw you shoulda motioned for him to come closer ... then get him in a headlock and start driving away.
no, shoulda held onto his hair and rolled up the window to trap his head in... then start to drive off... ****ing SNATCH style baby!
 
El Mariachi is offline
 
Sponsored Links
Squeeky
VeteranX
Old
202 - 09-04-2003, 23:14
11th page...

/me waits for the pics
 
Squeeky is offline
 
PyroTeknik
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
203 - 09-04-2003, 23:15
Pics of nspectre.
I want to see the man, the myth, the goatseer (.).
 
PyroTeknik is offline
 
xpdnc
VeteranXX
Contributor
Old
204 - 09-04-2003, 23:16
http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/charges/civil/310.htm

according to this, assault is the threat, and battery is the action
 
xpdnc is offline
 
StuffedMonkey
VeteranXV
Old
205 - 09-04-2003, 23:17
Long read obviously...........

Californian Stalking Law

Cal. Civil Code § 1708.7

(a) A person is liable for the tort of stalking when the plaintiff proves all of the following elements of the tort:

(1) The defendant engaged in a pattern of conduct the intent of which was to follow, alarm, or harass the plaintiff. In order to establish this element, the plaintiff shall be required to support his or her allegations with independent corroborating evidence.

(2) As a result of that pattern of conduct, the plaintiff reasonably feared for his or her safety, or the safety of an immediate family member. For purposes of this paragraph, "immediate family" means a spouse, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any person who regularly resides, or, within the six months preceding any portion of the pattern of conduct, regularly resided, in the plaintiff's household.

(3) One of the following:

(A) The defendant, as a part of the pattern of conduct specified in paragraph (1), made a credible threat with the intent to place the plaintiff in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of an immediate family member and, on at least one occasion, the plaintiff clearly and definitively demanded that the defendant cease and abate his or her pattern of conduct and the defendant persisted in his or her pattern of conduct.

(B) The defendant violated a restraining order, including, but not limited to, any order issued pursuant to Section 527.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, prohibiting any act described in subdivision (a).

(b) For the purposes of this section:

(1) "Pattern of conduct" means conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "pattern of conduct."

(2) "Credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that communicated by means of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and conduct, made with the intent and apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her immediate family.

(3) "Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, or pagers. "Electronic communication" has the same meaning as the term defined in Subsection 12 of Section 2510 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

(4) "Harass" means a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person which seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the person, and which serves no legitimate purpose. The course of conduct must be such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and must actually cause substantial emotional distress to the person.

(c) A person who commits the tort of stalking upon another is liable to that person for damages, including, but not limited to, general damages, special damages, and punitive damages pursuant to Section 3294.

(d) In an action pursuant to this section, the court may grant equitable relief, including, but not limited to, an injunction.

(e) The rights and remedies provided in this section are cumulative and in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law.

(f) This section shall not be construed to impair any constitutionally protected activity, including, but not limited to, speech, protest, and assembly.




Cal. Penal Code § 422

422. Any person who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed one year, or by imprisonment in the state prison. For the purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, whether by marriage or not, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household. "Electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular telephones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, or pagers. "Electronic communication" has the same meaning as the term defined in Subsection 12 of Section 2510 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Cal. Penal Code § 646.9

646.9. (a) Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person and who makes a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, is guilty of the crime of stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by imprisonment in the state prison.

(b) Any person who violates subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order, injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a) against the same party, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years.

(c) Every person who, having been convicted of a felony under this section, commits a second or subsequent violation of this section shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years.

(d) In addition to the penalties provided in this section, the sentencing court may order a person convicted of a felony under this section to register as a sex offender pursuant to subparagraph (E) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 290.

(e) For the purposes of this section, "harasses" means a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose. This course of conduct must be such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and must actually cause substantial emotional distress to the person.

(f) For purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."

(g) For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and conduct made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family and made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to prosecution under this section.

(h) For purposes of this section, the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, or pagers. "Electronic communication" has the same meaning as the term defined in Subsection 12 of Section 2510 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

(i) This section shall not apply to conduct that occurs during labor picketing.

(j) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of a sentence is suspended, for any person convicted under this section, it shall be a condition of probation that the person participate in counseling, as designated by the court. However, the court, upon a showing of good cause, may find that the counseling requirement shall not be imposed.

(k) The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any contact with the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his or her immediate family.

(l) For purposes of this section, "immediate family" means any spouse, parent, child, any person related by consanguinity or affinity within the second degree, or any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior six months, regularly resided in the household.

(m) The court shall consider whether the defendant would benefit from treatment pursuant to Section 2684. If it is determined to be appropriate, the court shall recommend that the Department of Corrections make a certification as provided in Section 2684. Upon the certification, the defendant shall be evaluated and transferred to the appropriate hospital for treatment pursuant to Section 2684.

646.91. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, a judicial officer may issue an ex parte emergency protective order where a peace officer, as defined in Section 830.1 or 830.2, asserts reasonable ground to believe that a person is in immediate and present danger of stalking based upon the person's allegation that he or she has been willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly followed or harassed by another person who has made a credible threat with the intent of placing the person who is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, within the meaning of Section 646.9.

(b) A peace officer who requests an emergency protective order shall reduce the order to writing and sign it. (c) An emergency protective order shall include all of the following:

(1) A statement of the grounds asserted for the order.

(2) The date and time the order expires.

(3) The address of the superior court for the district or county in which the protected party resides.

(4) The following statements, which shall be printed in English and Spanish:

(A) "To the protected person: This order will last until the date and time noted above. If you wish to seek continuing protection, you will have to apply for an order from the court at the address noted above. You may seek the advice of an attorney as to any matter connected with your application for any future court orders. The attorney should be consulted promptly so that the attorney may assist you in making your application."

(B) "To the restrained person: This order will last until the date and time noted above. The protected party may, however, obtain a more permanent restraining order from the court. You may seek the advice of an attorney as to any matter connected with the application. The attorney should be consulted promptly so that the attorney may assist you in responding to the application."

(c) An emergency protective order may be issued under this section only if the judicial officer finds both of the following:

(1) That reasonable grounds have been asserted to believe that an immediate and present danger of stalking, as defined in Section 646.9, exists.

(2) That an emergency protective order is necessary to prevent the occurrence or reoccurrence of the stalking activity.

(d) An emergency protective order may include either of the following specific orders as appropriate:

(1) A harassment protective order as described in Section 527.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

(2) A workplace violence protective order as described in Section 527.8 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

(e) An emergency protective order shall be issued without prejudice to any person.

(f) An emergency protective order expires at the earlier of the following times:

(1) The close of judicial business on the fifth court day following the day of its issuance.

(2) The seventh calendar day following the day of its issuance.

(g) A peace officer who requests an emergency protective order shall do all of the following:

(1) Serve the order on the restrained person, if the restrained person can reasonably be located.

(2) Give a copy of the order to the protected person, or, if the protected person is a minor child, to a parent or guardian of the protected child if the parent or guardian can reasonably be located, or to a person having temporary custody of the child.

(3) File a copy of the order with the court as soon as practicable after issuance.

(h) A peace officer shall use every reasonable means to enforce an emergency protective order.

(i) A peace officer who acts in good faith to enforce an emergency protective order is not civilly or criminally liable.

(j) A peace officer who requests an emergency protective order under this section shall carry copies of the order while on duty.

(k) "Judicial officer" as used in this section, means a judge, commissioner, or referee.

(l) Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit a court to issue an emergency protective order prohibiting speech or other activities that are constitutionally protected or protected by the laws of this state or by the United States or activities occurring during a labor dispute, as defined by Section 527.3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, including but not limited to, picketing and hand billing.

(m) The Judicial Council shall develop forms, instructions, and rules for the scheduling of hearings and other procedures established pursuant to this section.

(n) Any intentional disobedience of any emergency protective order granted under this section is punishable pursuant to Section 166. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to prevent punishment under Section 646.9, in lieu of punishment under this section, if a violation of Section 646.9 is also pled and proven.


Cal. Penal Code § 653m

653m. (a) Every person who, with intent to annoy, telephones or makes contact by means of an electronic communication device with another and addresses to or about the other person any obscene language or addresses to the other person any threat to inflict injury to the person or property of the person addressed or any member of his or her family, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith.

(b) Every person who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with intent to annoy another person at his or her residence, is, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, guilty of a misdemeanor. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith.

(c) Every person who makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by both the fine and imprisonment. Nothing in this subdivision shall apply to telephone calls or electronic contacts made in good faith. This subdivision applies only if one or both of the following circumstances exist:

(1) There is a temporary restraining order, an injunction, or any other court order, or any combination of these court orders, in effect prohibiting the behavior described in this section.

(2) The person makes repeated telephone calls or makes repeated contact by means of an electronic communication device with the intent to annoy another person at his or her place of work, totaling more than 10 times in a 24-hour period, whether or not conversation ensues from making the telephone call or electronic contact, and the repeated telephone calls or electronic contacts are made to the workplace of an adult or fully emancipated minor who is a spouse, former spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or person with whom the person has a child or has had a dating or engagement relationship or is having a dating or engagement relationship.

(d) Any offense committed by use of a telephone may be deemed to have been committed where the telephone call or calls were made or received. Any offense committed by use of an electronic communication device or medium, including the Internet, may be deemed to have been committed where the electronic communication or communications were originally sent or first viewed by the recipient.

(e) Subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is violated when the person acting with intent to annoy makes a telephone call requesting a return call and performs the acts prohibited under subdivision (a), (b), or (c) upon receiving the return call.

(f) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of sentence is suspended, for any person convicted under this section, the court may order as a condition of probation that the person participate in counseling.

(g) For purposes of this section the term "electronic communication device" includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, or pagers. "Electronic communication" has the same meaning as the term defined in Subsection 12 of Section 2510 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
StuffedMonkey is offline
 
Phrozen
VeteranXX
Old
206 - 09-04-2003, 23:17
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Mariachi
no, shoulda held onto his hair and rolled up the window to trap his head in... then start to drive off... ****ing SNATCH style baby!
OFN
 
Phrozen is offline
 
El Mariachi
VeteranXV
Old
207 - 09-04-2003, 23:18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phrozen
OFN
Ok, you got me. I didn't read the whole thread. That's what I get :/
 
El Mariachi is offline
 
Excel
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
208 - 09-04-2003, 23:19
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Mariachi
Ok, you got me. I didn't read the whole thread. That's what I get :/
I came with that when this was only 5 pages long, but I read the thread through so I didnt get ofn'd


... so it gets posted around page 7. Damnit.
 
Excel is offline
 
v20
Member
Old
209 - 09-04-2003, 23:20
awesomeness
 
v20 is offline
 
Phrozen
VeteranXX
Old
210 - 09-04-2003, 23:20
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Mariachi
Ok, you got me. I didn't read the whole thread. That's what I get :/
Thats what the big smiley is for El Mar. Great minds think alike.
 
Phrozen is offline
 
Highfive
VeteranXX
Contributor
Old
211 - 09-04-2003, 23:21
wtF?
 
Highfive is online now
 
Zombie
VeteranXX
Old
212 - 09-04-2003, 23:22
what a looser
 
Zombie is offline
 
Bounty
Love
Old
213 - 09-04-2003, 23:23
 
Bounty is offline
 
Hitman_T
VeteranXX
Old
214 - 09-04-2003, 23:23
11th page!! WHOOHOOO

This is starting to get out of hand. Nspec you need to get an RO on him. Present the thread he has on his board as evidence as well.
 
Hitman_T is offline
 
Teddy Grahams
VeteranX
Old
215 - 09-04-2003, 23:24
you shoulda headbutted him right in the ****ing nose when he was an inch away from your face screaming like a dumbass... that woulda made him shut the **** up
 
Teddy Grahams is offline
 
MaD_ReBeL
VeteranXV
Old
216 - 09-04-2003, 23:25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teddy Grahams
you shoulda headbutted him right in the ****ing nose when he was an inch away from your face screaming like a dumbass... that woulda made him shut the **** up
i love head butting people like that. broken a few nose bridges on my thick ass forehead.
 
MaD_ReBeL is offline
 
Teddy Grahams
VeteranX
Old
217 - 09-04-2003, 23:27
yea headbuttin will **** people up hardcore... especially in situations where the guy isnt even expecting it...
 
Teddy Grahams is offline
 
Boomer_941
VeteranXV
Old
218 - 09-04-2003, 23:30
Note: i just ogt home from work, not reading 10 pages to see f this was posted yet

ok so whats he up to now?

Stalking and threats of bodily harm

if you see him again take it to the police and put him back in jail so he can get butt raped again

Edit: wtf 11 now and someone jsut beat me to it
 
Boomer_941 is offline
 
Geck0
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
219 - 09-04-2003, 23:33
Quote:
I begin following him and all the sudden the dude pulls into a 7-11( incidentally the same 7-11 I posted about meeting Andrew Dice Clay having a slurpy in a few years back). Seeing this, I quickly pull into the lot and I have my girl, who has the camera get out. Hes getting outta his car when I say "Troy"? Hes says "yeah", I hold the goatsee pic out and I ask him "if its his". He hesitates, bites his lip, ****s himself and then stutters "y-y-yes?". I then ask him if hes a "tough guy". He says "no". I'm now inside his car while he sits there and I'm an inch from his face. I then tell him "do not ever come to my house again, do you understand me?". he says "yes, I understand". I then say, "I'll tell you what, I want you to get out and I'm gunna give you the first two shots, ok"? "He says, no, I don't want to have a problem with you like this man". Haha, I'm like "you don't, mother****er?". he then puts the car in reverse with me still in it and starts to pull out fast. I see this and start trying to get my body out of the way of the open car door but to no avail, he hits me with it. Then he drives outta the lot with the door still swinging open. He hauled ass.
So were you a blubberbutt or is this just ****?

The general thread of occurances is the same, but were you a fag about it and are now trying to spin? Or is he the spin doctor?

I doubt we'll ever know, but one thing is fact:

Nobody got hit by nobody. I'm betting you blubbered over each other and then had mansex. It's the only logical conclusion.
 
Geck0 is offline
 
Glare
VeteranXX
Old
220 - 09-04-2003, 23:33
people telling you to "get even" are stupid

bust his ass with an RO
 
Glare is offline
 
Page 11 of 27


Go Back   TribalWar Forums > TribalWar History > TWHOF
Reload this Page J. Daspin III of Flame4Cash fame has officially screwed the pooch

Social Website Bullshit


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


AGENT: claudebot / Y
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25.