commies are so fucking stupid
Dissent is anathema for the STEM autist. The Order provided by the State must be respected at all times, under all occasions, no exceptions amirite?i think anyone that blocks a roadway for protesting should be shot
or at the very least driven over
if she pulled a knife when she charged him, im good with the shooting not overly good with what happened BEFORE the shooting, but she should have been shot after pulling the knife.
http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs...g-students-with-autism-for-a-stem-career.htmlSTEM3 Academy operates under the auspices of The Help Group, a Los Angeles-based nonprofit dedicated to serving young people with special needs related to autism spectrum disorder ... .
What floodgates retard? We take in ~250K refugees every year, last year we added 25K from the >1KK available.I can understand helping refugees.
but I can't understand not helping ur own citizens without housing first. and I certainly don't understand letting the floodgates open without any sort of process in place to keep terrorists out.
http://www.nejm.org/medical-research/ethical-and-legal-issues... problem finding for the STEM autist is confined to the mathematical or engineering realms, the STEM autist is challenged to evaluate day-to-day issues of an emotional nature. The STEM autist simply doesn't have the emotional IQ to sort through even the simplest of societal issues ... .
They're starting to see that the tactics of the right work, that the neo-liberal doctrine of non-violence (see OWS 'protest') is useless.Why is the left so violent and intolerant?
They're starting to see that the tactics of the right work, that the neo-liberal doctrine of non-violence (see OWS 'protest') is useless.
Violence works. Violence is effective. Violence makes for change.
It's amusing how undemocratic people are being in their vain attempt at getting people to respect their rights.
You don't exercise your democratic rights by restricting another persons access to their democratic right. That just shows how little you know about how a democracy actually works.
Everyone gets a voice and then the people vote on which voice should represent the people as a whole.
If you don't like what Trump voice represents, then don't vote for him. You don't get to muffle him and take away his voice just because you don't like the sound of it. That's undemocratic.
It's amusing how undemocratic people are being in their vain attempt at getting people to respect their rights.
You don't exercise your democratic rights by restricting another persons access to their democratic right. That just shows how little you know about how a democracy actually works.
Everyone gets a voice and then the people vote on which voice should represent the people as a whole.
If you don't like what Trump voice represents, then don't vote for him. You don't get to muffle him and take away his voice just because you don't like the sound of it. That's undemocratic.
It's amusing how undemocratic people are being in their vain attempt at getting people to respect their rights.
You don't exercise your democratic rights by restricting another persons access to their democratic right. That just shows how little you know about how a democracy actually works.
Everyone gets a voice and then the people vote on which voice should represent the people as a whole.
If you don't like what Drumpf voice represents, then don't vote for him. You don't get to muffle him and take away his voice just because you don't like the sound of it. That's undemocratic.
Saul who?You couldnt be more wrong if you tried.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_Democratic_National_Convention_protest_activity
Anyone with a shred of political sense knows that the Left follows Saul Alinsky's rules for shit heads published after the 1968 DNC riots.
The endtstate of the left is to collapse the capitalist system. Ref: cloward-piven. It's already been reiterated here with a 'basic income' a few threads ago.
If that is true, then fuck the GOP. Trump/Sanders 2016
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
Saul who?
I'm not condoning their "I shot myself in the foot" actions, it's self defeating to physically bar anyone from attending a political rally/protest.
But let's not kid ourselves, non-violent protests are never effective.
Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals is the late work of community organizer Saul D. Alinsky, and his last book, published in 1971 shortly before his death. His goal for the Rules for Radicals was to create a guide for future community organizers to use in uniting low-income communities, or "Have-Nots", in order to empower them to gain social, political, legal and economic equality by challenging the current agencies that promoted their inequality.[1] Within it, Alinsky compiled the lessons he had learned throughout his personal experiences of community organizing spanning from 1939-1971 and targeted these lessons at the current, new generation of radicals.[2]
The rules[1]
“Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.
“Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
“Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
“Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
“A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
“A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.
“Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
“The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
"The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition." It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.
“If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
“The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.
“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.