credibly
easy to believe on the basis of available evidence.
accused
a defendant in a criminal proceeding.
There is no available evidence that can be put together to make it 'easily believable' and there was no crime committed. Yet, the Statists continue to use the two words strung together plus "rape" in an attempt to frame Brett for a crime that some random democratic operative believes he might have committed 30+ years ago.
The media has successfully put an * next to this guys name for the rest of his life, even if a trial went forward and cleared him. The retarded left will never accept it because women are always to be believed (even though most of them are fucking insane) and that him being cleared is all the proof needed to prove of white male privilege.
And this is directed towards a possible supreme court judge. Can you imagine if this happens to one of us, little people?
easy to believe on the basis of available evidence.
accused
a defendant in a criminal proceeding.
There is no available evidence that can be put together to make it 'easily believable' and there was no crime committed. Yet, the Statists continue to use the two words strung together plus "rape" in an attempt to frame Brett for a crime that some random democratic operative believes he might have committed 30+ years ago.
The media has successfully put an * next to this guys name for the rest of his life, even if a trial went forward and cleared him. The retarded left will never accept it because women are always to be believed (even though most of them are fucking insane) and that him being cleared is all the proof needed to prove of white male privilege.
And this is directed towards a possible supreme court judge. Can you imagine if this happens to one of us, little people?
