I'm here. Glad I'm a nutritarian.Welp, NGFM
you are fitting a hypothesis to the data. you are arguing that a linear increase in food production causes a non-linear or exponential increase in foodborne illness. citation desperately needed.
Where? I never made any claims that there would be an exponential increase. My argument is simply that a higher output of food results in a higher rate of foodborne illness.
you understand that 1 in 100 is the same as 2 in 200 right? a "higher rate" means that you are talking about going from 1 in 100 to 2 in 100, not 2 in 200. if you're arguing 2 in 200 is different from 1 in 100, your argument is nonsensical. so you're either continuing to spew nonsense, or you're arguing for a non-linear relationship, pick one.
My argument was that with a higher amount of food produced, it stands to reason that you would see a linear increase to the number of foodborne illness cases reported.
tbh I think that is an incorrect assumption. In manufacturing, if you make more vehicles you have fewer failures. the more you do something the better you get and the more resources are put into perfecting it.
My mistake on poor word choice then. I was never trying to claim there would be a non-linear increase. My argument was that with a higher amount of food produced, it stands to reason that you would see a linear increase to the number of foodborne illness cases reported.
Fool said:No, but more food production means a higher likelihood of foodborne illnesses.
Ummm.....so.... their citation in the vid description does not claim 0 deaths in 2016. it claims 77 deaths due to salmonella in england and wales in 2008. it's also comparing rigorous data from the cdc which covers ALL foodborne illness to a "strategy" pamphlet by the UK food standards agency that covers 6 pathogens.
from the CDC study:
whoops, looks like they even pointed out highly suspect data likely behind whatever created that pamphlet LOOOOOL
From the three spent hen processing plants, samples of intestines and sera were collected from 740 birds presented for slaughter from 37 flocks of 22 layer hen farms. [...] Salmonellae were isolated from the birds of ten layer hen farms, all of these hens were raised in houses without windows and with automatic feeders. No isolations of salmonella were made from birds raised in houses with windows.
o wutta suprize amapedo n an00bis shown y dey both bettuh off ded not even belongin 2 live in dey own chithole country dis y dey famly n frenz wishn dem wyte trash pussycuck disgr8c 2 dey own races gon die asap so peeps can b happy smdh lol
In 2016 (not 2008 btw): 8630 cases, 24 hospitalizations, 0 deaths
We determined the proportion of illnesses ascertained through FoodNet that were caused by Campylobacter spp., Cryptosporidium spp., C. cayatanensis, L. monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., STEC, Vibrio spp., and Y. enterocolitica that were also reported to FDOSS as outbreak associated and applied the inverse of this proportion, 25.5, to those pathogens (Technical Appendix 4).
The US had 6 times the population, but 1000 times the number of hopsitalizations due to salmonella in 2016. Even if we grant Fool his "20 times the food produced" thing, that's way the fuck off the scale.
animals exist 2 b eaten tbh
Yeah but they should be treated nicely before we kill em and grill em