smdh lolomg im still a barbak spikktrash shitlib scumfucc
smdh lolomg im still a barbak spikktrash shitlib scumfucc
did that dude spray paint his bald head
ty 4 famly album pic oldnativecuckfuk pussyass vanstr smdh lol
all this bed-wetting from them came from me posting a picture of 33 yr old stephen miller having what appears to be 70s bush glued to the top of his head for a tv interview btw
this would be equally hilarious if it was some asshole who happened to be a dem
California reverses course on plan to tax text messages
The proposal was withdrawn after a new FCC ruling limited states' authority over texting.
all this bed-wetting from them came from me posting a picture of 33 yr old stephen miller having what appears to be 70s bush glued to the top of his head for a tv interview btw
this would be equally hilarious if it was some asshole who happened to be a dem
and what does posting a picture of a 33 yr old dude who spray paints a hair triangle on his head
And at spray painting his dome.did that dude spray paint his bald head
And...?
Let's review the bidding:
Original Obamacare Violated the Commerce Clause. In June 2012, in NFIB v. Sebelius, the Supreme Court of the U.S. (SCOTUS) ruled that the individual mandate was an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause. A majority of the court agreed that the Commerce Clause prohibits Americans from being forced to purchase health insurance (or any other product) simply because Congress thinks it's a good idea.
Original Obamacare Unconstitutionally Coerced States. In the same decision, SCOTUS ruled that Obamacare's Medicaid expansi0n was unconstitutionally coercive on the states. A majority of the court--including Justices Breyer and Kagan--concluded that Congress exceeded its enumerated powers and violated basic principles of federalism when it coerces States into accepting onerous conditions that it could not impose directly by threatening to withhold all federal funding under Medicaid.
SCOTUS-Modified Obamacare Violates the Commerce Clause. On December 14, 2018, U.S. District Court Judge Reed O'Connor ruled that the law's individual mandate is unconstitutional, and that because the mandate cannot be separated from the rest of the law, the rest of the law is also invalid (full ruling). It remains to be seen whether SCOTUS will uphold this ruling.
Emo's will emo.
[.....]
"At stake is the question of whether or not the United States remains a sovereign country," Miller told CBS News' "Face The Nation." "The Democrat Party has a simple choice. They can either choose to fight for America's working class or to promote illegal immigration. You can't do both."
[.....]
the first time we agree on something. shut the border down.shut it all down boys