Dangerdoggie
Veteran XV
cael, does it eat at you every day that Trump won the election? Does it eat at you like a cancer that your girl Hillary lost?
2. I'm pretty sure not a SINGLE ONE of his transition team/future Cabinet is even remotely qualified for their prospective positions, in some cases almost the opposite of being qualified (there has to be a concise word for that...)
And if some experts are claiming there is reasonable possibility there were miscounts in three key states in which both parties were closely tied where's the coverage?
Should I not be surprised the recount thing isn't really covered more?
1. Trump will be President.
2. I'm pretty sure not a SINGLE ONE of his transition team/future Cabinet is even remotely qualified for their prospective positions, in some cases almost the opposite of being qualified (there has to be a concise word for that...)
3. Continuously flip-flopping on issues he said during his campaign.
4. Literally no real words on the hate-crimes being committed in his name, if you want to count that one off-handed, evasive comment in the interview where he says "don't do that."
5. His ignorant insistence on finding ways to run his business AND the Presidency at the same time, to the point he would rather live in his Tower in NYC than the White House, costing NYC a good chunk of change.
6. A completely GOP domination of two of the three branches, which last I remembered happened just before the Great Depression.
I mean honestly, is the media really ignoring/suppressing all of this and simply want the public to "just accept it"? I mean fuck I remember during one of Bush Jr's elections (cannot remember which one) there was a HUGE deal over recounts in three districts in FL. And if some experts are claiming there is reasonable possibility there were miscounts in three key states in which both parties were closely tied where's the coverage?
I mean fuck I remember during one of Bush Jr's elections (cannot remember which one) there was a HUGE deal over recounts in three districts in FL. And if some experts are claiming there is reasonable possibility there were miscounts in three key states in which both parties were closely tied where's the coverage?
I mean honestly, is the media really ignoring/suppressing all of this and simply want the public to "just accept it"? I mean fuck I remember during one of Bush Jr's elections (cannot remember which one) there was a HUGE deal over recounts in three districts in FL. And if some experts are claiming there is reasonable possibility there were miscounts in three key states in which both parties were closely tied where's the coverage?
What kind of overemotional monster would react in such a manner as to falsely claim a hate crime was committed just for the attention?
Should I not be surprised the recount thing isn't really covered more?
1. Trump will be President.
2. I'm pretty sure not a SINGLE ONE of his transition team/future Cabinet is even remotely qualified for their prospective positions, in some cases almost the opposite of being qualified (there has to be a concise word for that...)
3. Continuously flip-flopping on issues he said during his campaign.
4. Literally no real words on the hate-crimes being committed in his name, if you want to count that one off-handed, evasive comment in the interview where he says "don't do that."
5. His ignorant insistence on finding ways to run his business AND the Presidency at the same time, to the point he would rather live in his Tower in NYC than the White House, costing NYC a good chunk of change.
6. A completely GOP domination of two of the three branches, which last I remembered happened just before the Great Depression.
I mean honestly, is the media really ignoring/suppressing all of this and simply want the public to "just accept it"? I mean fuck I remember during one of Bush Jr's elections (cannot remember which one) there was a HUGE deal over recounts in three districts in FL. And if some experts are claiming there is reasonable possibility there were miscounts in three key states in which both parties were closely tied where's the coverage?
Should I not be surprised the recount thing isn't really covered more?
1. Trump will be President.
True.
2. I'm pretty sure not a SINGLE ONE of his transition team/future Cabinet is even remotely qualified for their prospective positions, in some cases almost the opposite of being qualified (there has to be a concise word for that...)
Wat? As opposed to other people who buy their way in, say like Ambassadors?
3. Continuously flip-flopping on issues he said during his campaign.
Such as?
4. Literally no real words on the hate-crimes being committed in his name, if you want to count that one off-handed, evasive comment in the interview where he says "don't do that."
Like these? 15 Hate Hoaxes You Can Dispel This Thanksgiving
5. His ignorant insistence on finding ways to run his business AND the Presidency at the same time, to the point he would rather live in his Tower in NYC than the White House, costing NYC a good chunk of change.
Where did you learn this?
6. A completely GOP domination of two of the three branches, which last I remembered happened just before the Great Depression.
Wrong. Your memory sucks: 109th United States Congress - Wikipedia
I mean honestly, is the media really ignoring/suppressing all of this and simply want the public to "just accept it"? I mean fuck I remember during one of Bush Jr's elections (cannot remember which one) there was a HUGE deal over recounts in three districts in FL. And if some experts are claiming there is reasonable possibility there were miscounts in three key states in which both parties were closely tied where's the coverage?