This is for you Trump voters.

What about it was misleading? Even accounting for how annoying Matthews can be it was a pretty simple question, do you think the women should be punished for getting an abortion?
 
What about it was misleading? Even accounting for how annoying Matthews can be it was a pretty simple question, do you think the women should be punished for getting an abortion?

You left out... if it was declared illegal or banned......
 
And? That doesn't make the question misleading either.

No, but it is leaving out the important part that provides context to the answer that is the problem.

It's the difference between:

"Trump says women who have abortions should be punished"

and

"Trump says that if abortion were declared illegal or banned, then women who have abortions should be punished"
 
i wish trump was more quick witted and smartass instead of just agressive. the perfect response to that retarded question would have been "if it was made illegal for stupid people to ask stupid questions, yes i do believe you would be severly punished"
 
Let's see Mathews ask Bernie or Hillary if they think the 15 year old girl who assaulted an old man at a Trump rally should be punished. Bet they blame anyone else but the girl.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 
She was assaulted first

Nope.

Police: Teen who got pepper sprayed at Donald Trump rally in Janesville wasn't sexually assaulted

http://www.tmj4.com/news/local-news/police-teen-at-donald-trump-rally-wasnt-sexually-assaulted

*However, using video, witness accounts, and interviews, investigators determined there was no sexual assault, and that the 15-year-old girl had punched a 59-year-old man in the face.

That man is not pressing charges against the girl. She has been referred to juvenile authorities on disorderly conduct charges, police said.
 
Dude should press charges. Get her ass involved in the legal system nice and young. BTW- wtf is a 15 year old girl doing protesting politics when she knows nothing about them?
 
He's just a parrot, does no critical thinking on his own.

not attacking GH specifically, but rather the drones who get their news from one side and never ever actually look to see if it is the complete story.

MSNBC, Huffpo, NBC/CBS/ABC - they all go with the headline that supports making Trump look bad, and do not make an effort to provide the rest of the story.

The drones find it easier to let others do the research and fact finding for them. Jon Stewart's fans (and now John Oliver's) take what they report at face value and do not research it. I suppose you could accept that news and move on with no real damage but if you are making decisions based on those stories...or making an internet post inferring that the comment (mine in this case) was incorrect, you might want to be well informed first.

Or don't, and vote for Hillary

America First!
 
Back
Top