[Politics] Should infanticide be legalized?

Accepting risk is not the same as consent. When you get in your car, you accept the risk that you might get into an accident, [strike]but you're not consenting to getting into an accident.[/strike]

ftfy

why would you seek consent to get into an accident?

now do you realize how stupid your position is?

carry on and gl
 
ftfy

why would you seek consent to get into an accident?
You don't. That's my point.

You can consent to driving your car, but not consent to unintended consequences of driving your car, e.g. getting into an accident.

You can consent to having sex, but not consent to unintended consequences of having sex, e.g. unwillingly becoming pregnant.

You can consent to becoming pregnant, but not consent to unintended consequences of becoming pregnant, e.g. staying pregnant when it's no longer feasible.
 
trump should work with fed prosecutors, and announce that any politician that is involved in giving permission to murder children (brfore or after birth) will be charged with conspiracy to comit murder, and sentenced to life in prison.
 
... Yes because all doctors agree on terms of treatment. Nobody ever gets second opinions.

I don't know why you are equating getting a different medical opinion with someone performing an illegal and potentially dangerous surgery...

it's almost as if none of you fucking idiots can argue anything without making shit up or taking giant leaps from subject to subject :ftard:
 
You don't. That's my point.

You can consent to driving your car, but not consent to unintended consequences of driving your car, e.g. getting into an accident.

If you drive your car recklessly are the "unintended consequences" not your fault?

If you have sex recklessly are the "unintended consequences" not your fault?

that's your point lmfao
 
The only time the word 'consent' should be used is when someone is discussing it as "the consent of the governed."

I never consented to be governed by the idiots that get elected. I never consented to have my taxes pay for all this odious debt, foreign governments, and corporate and socialist welfare.
 
If you drive your car recklessly are the "unintended consequences" not your fault?

If you have sex recklessly are the "unintended consequences" not your fault?

that's your point lmfao
Nobody was talking about recklessness. -SS- was arguing that as long as you gave consent to sex, no matter how careful you were not to get pregnant, you have a responsibility to keep the baby if you do.

But since you brought up recklessness:

1. Even if you drive a car recklessly, you're not denied medical attention to deal with the consequences. The doctor won't go "nope, you're the one who caused the accident, we're not gonna put a cast on your broken arm". There might be other consequences of course, but lack of medical care will not be one of them.

2. Idk if you're aware, but pregnancy and abortion have very serious medical risks. Do you think that any woman who is well-informed about those risks would use abortion as their first line of defense against pregnancy as opposed to the much safer options of condoms or birth control pills?

3. If you're gonna make recklessness a factor in who gets access to abortions and who doesn't, then how will you prove that a pregnancy was the result of reckless sex? How do you even define reckless sex?
 
Last edited:
i think we are all in favor of aborting bronies and pedos

no matter what trimester they are on

so there is middle ground compromise here if we keep working
 
Nobody was talking about recklessness. -SS- was arguing that as long as you gave consent to sex, no matter how careful you were not to get pregnant, you have a responsibility to keep the baby if you do.

quote where that was said

otherwise youre a liar or have a serious comprehension problem

:)
 
quote where that was said

otherwise youre a liar or have a serious comprehension problem

:)

once you give consent, you accept *personal* responsibility regardless the outcome, pregnant or not, STD or not.

thats the risk involved and you are not absolved of it at any time. You can not give consent for one and not the other because they are part of the same decision.
 
LOL

thats you trying to take me out of context and nowhere does it imply you have to keep the child

the context was clear: you cant have consent for one and no consent for the other

thats your incompetence, try again?
 
backpedal-500x270.jpg
 
Someone should invent a method to not get non-consensually pregnant if you engage in consensual sex.
 
ikr? like maybe something the dude can put on his schlong that somehow stops pregnancy?

idk, im not a doctor
you literally just opened up the entire legal system to women suing males for getting them pregnant.

They already cannot be charged with a DUI/DWI and now they are no longer responsible for getting pregnant.
 
Back
Top