The NYT never quoted that, though. Their actual quote was this:
Granted he was wrong, but he said it.
[Mega] MAGA Super Trump Mega Thread
- Thread starter -SS-
- Start date
The NYT never quoted that, though. Their actual quote was this:
Granted he was wrong, but he said it.
It's not the NYT's job to frame a story the way the president likes.
triple keeps accusing others of what he is best at in here
"You're missing the point" he says.....keeps saying
as he changes subjects, definitions, and the lexicon of the conversation
someone else is going to have to help me out since he can't.....
triple calls Kim a murderer.......says we shouldn't even meet with him in person
instead he wants CIA to just poison him at lunch
says you can kill whoever you want to, whenever you want to, because of his loosely defined interpretation of justice.
basically he is Lindsey Graham of the left.....equally the neocon.
Lindsey Graham says we shouldn't be talking peace but war with NK right now. That we should think about nuclear war with the entire region......
When prompted on why......because KIM is a murderer.
Ummmmmmm.....wtf am I missing here because I am missing something big.
Almost all of Kim's kill count are deaths by attrition, him not having enough food and resources to feed all his people. People being angry and vocal that they are hungry and him squashing that resistance. So the neocon solution to that suffering, that strife, is MAXIMUM SANCTIONS cutting them off and not allowing anything to be sent into the country that was already starving in hopes of forcing their leader to re-evaluate their situation (like he just did). When Kim decides to talk their next solution is to not listen but to simply attack him, kill him, keep waving the Muammar Gaddafi in his face like Bolton did...........
and why? Because KIM is a murderer
This is what neocon liberation looks like to the rest of us
Libya "Before And After" Photos Go Viral
And for our next trick Assad is a murderer.......which is where 2.0 of this goes next
actually 5.0....because Afghanistan was 1.0, Iraq was 2.0, Libya, Yemen/Oman were 3-4.0
Am I missing something that I didn't already say or figure out here?
"You're missing the point" he says.....keeps saying
as he changes subjects, definitions, and the lexicon of the conversation
someone else is going to have to help me out since he can't.....
triple calls Kim a murderer.......says we shouldn't even meet with him in person
instead he wants CIA to just poison him at lunch
says you can kill whoever you want to, whenever you want to, because of his loosely defined interpretation of justice.
basically he is Lindsey Graham of the left.....equally the neocon.
Lindsey Graham says we shouldn't be talking peace but war with NK right now. That we should think about nuclear war with the entire region......
When prompted on why......because KIM is a murderer.
Ummmmmmm.....wtf am I missing here because I am missing something big.
Almost all of Kim's kill count are deaths by attrition, him not having enough food and resources to feed all his people. People being angry and vocal that they are hungry and him squashing that resistance. So the neocon solution to that suffering, that strife, is MAXIMUM SANCTIONS cutting them off and not allowing anything to be sent into the country that was already starving in hopes of forcing their leader to re-evaluate their situation (like he just did). When Kim decides to talk their next solution is to not listen but to simply attack him, kill him, keep waving the Muammar Gaddafi in his face like Bolton did...........
and why? Because KIM is a murderer
This is what neocon liberation looks like to the rest of us
Libya "Before And After" Photos Go Viral
And for our next trick Assad is a murderer.......which is where 2.0 of this goes next
actually 5.0....because Afghanistan was 1.0, Iraq was 2.0, Libya, Yemen/Oman were 3-4.0
Am I missing something that I didn't already say or figure out here?
Last edited:
Fool
Whiny Bitch
No, it's their job to frame a story truthfully, which they did not. They framed a story in a manner that they preferred, because it's what their readers wanted to hear.
Also Kim served Donald the spring roll d ohms law smurf says........
china was the big winner these morons keep chanting
uhhh......how you can say that after the Iran boondoggle and billion dollar give away I'm not sure.......but does anyone want to guess what would happen if Kim's regime fell right now and who would end up controlling that?
Yeah.....China......the one you claim is the big winner because we temporarily stopped military exercises with SK as a good faith demonstration until they can prove to do the same.
Full sanctions.....NK regime breakdown.......China annexes NK but not doing that (yet) was somehow the same thing? You fuckers are as delusional as you are dishonest.
the left are nothing but blood thirsty, masochistic, narcissistic, authoritarians at this point.
no wonder they want the economy to collapse and world war to break out again
that this and tax raises and being pro ms-13 is the only platforms they have been able to put together this year so far.
china was the big winner these morons keep chanting
uhhh......how you can say that after the Iran boondoggle and billion dollar give away I'm not sure.......but does anyone want to guess what would happen if Kim's regime fell right now and who would end up controlling that?
Yeah.....China......the one you claim is the big winner because we temporarily stopped military exercises with SK as a good faith demonstration until they can prove to do the same.
Full sanctions.....NK regime breakdown.......China annexes NK but not doing that (yet) was somehow the same thing? You fuckers are as delusional as you are dishonest.
the left are nothing but blood thirsty, masochistic, narcissistic, authoritarians at this point.
no wonder they want the economy to collapse and world war to break out again
that this and tax raises and being pro ms-13 is the only platforms they have been able to put together this year so far.
Last edited:
Fool
Whiny Bitch
Not for nothing triple, but who do you think winds up looking better in this scenario? The NYT said the date was all but impossible, then it happened anyway. By framing the context, they have literally created a scenario where Trump's team pulled off something that was "all but impossible".
Had they been honest, and said "expressed doubts" or "unlikely", a far more reasonable context, it would not matter much and it certainly doesn't place them in a position where they have no real escape clause.
Had they been honest, and said "expressed doubts" or "unlikely", a far more reasonable context, it would not matter much and it certainly doesn't place them in a position where they have no real escape clause.
or in CNN's case frame it in any realm of reality.......
even consistently within their own
they are so stupid
taken from r/politics thread
RUSSIANS ARE EVERYWHERE
Stormy Daniels' Lawyer Now Blames Russia For Smearing Him
We need more nukes.......more blood on the streets to save the REPUBLIC
adam schiff and eric swalwell for sure the sources of this one
yes, helolo there
plz refer to 20th century leftist ideology and their murder / death / kill results
do not expect that to change with change of new century or fooled by 'hopium and chainz' rhetoric
tyiavm
All but impossible wasn't in quote marks, indicating it was paraphrasing and not a direct quote - and even then, they included the exact quote, in quote marks, so readers could make up their own minds.
How were readers misled?
You seem to want soundbites printed verbatim, with no analysis. That's not what the media's job is.
i mean this is pretty remarkable that we can get them to admit this openly
that this isn't even being lied about or disguised anymore
I mean pagy just hit the nail on the head here..........
explains why John McCain and Lindsey Graham are now essentially Democrats and the entire DNC + NEOCON brigade were always so indistinguishable to me. Why I was never tricked by voting for them or even Mitt Romney types.
How the Bush and Clinton Regimes always looked so indistinguishable to me.......
But Trump is the bad guy? Trump is the problem we are facing?
In what world can that be explained
Fool
Whiny Bitch
Do you not know what framing is?
context isn't important to media
we agree.......
their job isn't to tell you what was said, what happened, but to shape and form your opinion on what they want you to think happened on any given day.....for any given event
and boy do people like you love that shit and eat it up with a spoon.
*shocking*