I'm about a week late on the 9/11 stuff by Rosdower - Page 4 - TribalWar Forums
Click Here to find great hosting deals from Branzone.com


Go Back   TribalWar Forums > TribalWar Community > General Discussion
Reload this Page I'm about a week late on the 9/11 stuff
Page 4 of 10
Thread Tools
absent
VeteranXV
Old
61 - 09-17-2011, 15:56
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarBuddha View Post
I have no idea how the **** you would demolish a 1400-1700 foot building.
But you certainly know for a fact that it doesn't require or benefit from explosives based on the top. That's good to know and a very typical example of the type of idiot who believes that the equation (2 planes = three towers in the dust) is valid.
 
absent is offline
 
Sponsored Links
WarBuddha
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
62 - 09-17-2011, 15:59
Reply With Quote


I'm glad that TW's resident experts on how to commercially destroy a 1400 foot building which has never happened before are out today.

Let me ask you this.

In order to plant the explosives where they could be set off and work correctly you would have to know exactly where the planes were going to hit, correct?
 
WarBuddha is offline
 
absent
VeteranXV
Old
63 - 09-17-2011, 16:02
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarBuddha View Post
Let me ask you this.

In order to plant the explosives where they could be set off and work correctly you would have to know exactly where the planes were going to hit, correct?
Obviously not. You could plant the explosives and have the planes ram the towers where ever just for show so that morons like you would go after dem darn terrists!!
 
absent is offline
 
WarBuddha
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
64 - 09-17-2011, 16:06
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by absent View Post
Obviously not. You could plant the explosives and have the planes ram the towers where ever just for show so that morons like you would go after dem darn terrists!!
what?

You understand how demolishing a building works, right? It's a science. It's a timing of explosives in several locations at one time that create a building to fall more in on itself then out so it doesn't damage anything around it. The complications and math that would be required to bring down a 1400 foot building that was hit BY A ****ING AIRLINER would be ridiculous.

The government had prior knowledge that the attacks were going to occur, this I have no doubt of. But this whole they planted explosives in the towers bull**** is hilarious.
 
WarBuddha is offline
 
fartiusstinkius
VeteranXV
Old
65 - 09-17-2011, 16:09
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nash View Post
Seriously tho, anyone who actually believes the official story about 9/11 is beyond retarded or rather, was successfully brainwashed.
I saw two planes go into two buildings. I then saw them fall. I then saw another building next to them fall. I didn't see anything beyond that. I concluded that the two planes caused this chain of events.


Was I brainwashed? If yes, who brainwashed me? My eyes?
 
fartiusstinkius is offline
 
WarBuddha
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
66 - 09-17-2011, 16:12
Reply With Quote
A challenge to conspiracy theorists:

1) Find a steel frame building at least 40 stories high

2) Which takes up a whole city block

3) And is a "Tube in a tube" design

4) Which came off its core columns at the bottom floors (Earthquake, fire, whatever - WTC 7)

5) Which was struck by another building or airliner and had structural damage as a result.

6) And weakened by fire for over 6 hours

7) And had trusses that were bolted on with two 5/8" bolts.
 
WarBuddha is offline
 
absent
VeteranXV
Old
67 - 09-17-2011, 16:13
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarBuddha View Post
what?

You understand how demolishing a building works, right? It's a science. It's a timing of explosives in several locations at one time that create a building to fall more in on itself then out so it doesn't damage anything around it. The complications and math that would be required to bring down a 1400 foot building that was hit BY A ****ING AIRLINER would be ridiculous.
What about the top explosion? Would that have been set to add a free-fall mass on top of the rest of the building after a plane hit, to stabilize the vector? I don't know, but it's plain obvious that the towers were demolished. If the planes had brought the towers down, they'd have obviously fallen to their sides instead of straight down, causing tens of thousands of casualties. The jews calculated the rough amount of casualties needed to get their intended result. 10,000+ dead would have had people demanding a real investigation. 3,000 was enough to get the idiots simply demanding blood.
 
absent is offline
 
WarBuddha
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
68 - 09-17-2011, 16:16
Reply With Quote
Free fall?

 
WarBuddha is offline
 
absent
VeteranXV
Old
69 - 09-17-2011, 16:18
Reply With Quote
This is getting carried away. The method of execution of WTC-D is irrelevant. I don't care if the bacciferous fart of a caged macaw did the trick. The real cheese is where the bread crumbs lead: who benefited? The jews did. That's where the story lies.
 
absent is offline
 
WarBuddha
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
70 - 09-17-2011, 16:21
Reply With Quote
 
WarBuddha is offline
 
absent
VeteranXV
Old
71 - 09-17-2011, 16:22
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarBuddha View Post
Free fall?

Yes. That chart is false, as can be inferred from the creator.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjSd9wB55zk
 
absent is offline
 
Dresden
VeteranXV
Old
72 - 09-17-2011, 16:24
Reply With Quote
Similar to the assassination of JFK, there was many people involved and lot of evidence but to this day the official story remains on Oswald.

Pearl Harbor now has enough collaborative evidence to point to prior knowledge of the attack but it was allowed to take place to get America into the war.

9/11 is no different

Rinse and repeat
 
Dresden is offline
 
fartiusstinkius
VeteranXV
Old
73 - 09-17-2011, 16:28
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dresden View Post
Similar to the assassination of JFK, there was many people involved and lot of evidence but to this day the official story remains on Oswald.

Pearl Harbor now has enough collaborative evidence to point to prior knowledge of the attack but it was allowed to take place to get America into the war.

9/11 is no different

Rinse and repeat
Are you saying that there was intelligence prior to 9/11 indicating such an attack would occur yet it wasn't acted upon? Or are you possibly saying that the buildings were intentionally demolished? I would believe the former...the latter seems quite ridiculous.
 
fartiusstinkius is offline
 
WarBuddha
VeteranXV
Contributor
Old
74 - 09-17-2011, 16:30
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by absent View Post
Yes. That chart is false, as can be inferred from the creator.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjSd9wB55zk
That's an awesome perversion of physics right there. I like how he removes all the other factors involved.
 
WarBuddha is offline
 
absent
VeteranXV
Old
75 - 09-17-2011, 16:35
Reply With Quote
Right. Keep in mind I'm not trying to convince you - you were stupid enough to sign up for the Red White and Blue international mass murder machine, so it's not like you'd admit you worked for a criminal entity and are therefore a thug yourself. I'm just pointing out clearly observable facts to the sideliners.
 
absent is offline
 
fartiusstinkius
VeteranXV
Old
76 - 09-17-2011, 16:50
Reply With Quote
The "logic" in that video is interesting. It's similar to many arguments supporting intelligent design. Basically some sort of mathematical model is being used to show that what just occurred couldn't have happened. Then the person concludes something else caused it. The other option, that the model itself is wrong, seems to be less often considered in these videos. For example, the guy could stop and say, "Hey I see no evidence that anything but the airplanes brought down the buildings," and then sit down and try to figure out where his previous logic went wrong.

That or he could just assume that he's always right and knows all and never makes mistakes in analysis and never has a lack of information and never misunderstands kinetic and static physics theories or that those theories might have flaws and post videos about it on youtube. It's funny the different intellectual paths people choose.
 
fartiusstinkius is offline
 
Nash
Nazi Admin++
Contributor
Old
77 - 09-17-2011, 17:25
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarBuddha View Post
That's an awesome perversion of physics right there. I like how he removes all the other factors involved.
I would say that almost 1.600 verified professional architects and engineers know a bit more about this then any of us. Not counting dozens of witnesses saying they heard explosions prior of the towers collapsing.

Just saying.
 
Nash is online now
 
mjoe
VeteranXV
Old
78 - 09-17-2011, 17:30
Reply With Quote
oh, he forgot to add in the rotation of the earth and the wind. the point is that this is not a hypothetical model, these are basic laws of the universe that are not being followed. the distance between what is observed and what would occur as a result of the official explanation is not a minor error in the model.
 
mjoe is offline
 
SINep
VeteranXV
Old
79 - 09-17-2011, 17:36
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by fartiusstinkius View Post
Are you saying that there was intelligence prior to 9/11 indicating such an attack would occur yet it wasn't acted upon? Or are you possibly saying that the buildings were intentionally demolished? I would believe the former...the latter seems quite ridiculous.
Foreknowledge of 9-11 / Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG)

Bring on the archives!
 
SINep is offline
 
Last edited by SINep; 09-17-2011 at 17:43..
OneManArmy
VeteranX
Old
80 - 09-17-2011, 17:37
Reply With Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by absent View Post
In that case we'd have to kill you for believing that two planes hitting two extremely well reinforced skyscrapers in different spots at different heights is enough to destabilize them to the point of bringing the towers down in free-fall mode. I mean, that's the height of idiocy I reckon. Must be painful to tie your shoelaces, being so ****ing stupid.
I am pretty sure that sums it up...
 
OneManArmy is offline
 
Page 4 of 10
Reply


Go Back   TribalWar Forums > TribalWar Community > General Discussion
Reload this Page I'm about a week late on the 9/11 stuff

Social Website Bullshit

Tags
\_(ツ)_/


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


AGENT: CCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/) / Y
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34.